2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9472-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of computed tomography in the context of aortic valve disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the transesophagic ultrasound, Fleutchner confirms a 95% sensibility and a 96---100% specificity in the detection of moderate-serious aortic failures analyzing not only the orifice but also the regurgitant fraction. 15,16 …”
Section: Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the transesophagic ultrasound, Fleutchner confirms a 95% sensibility and a 96---100% specificity in the detection of moderate-serious aortic failures analyzing not only the orifice but also the regurgitant fraction. 15,16 …”
Section: Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AVA quantification by CT during the midsystole (5%–25% of RR-interval) is feasible [1127] and proven accurate with r values of mean 0.8–0.9 as compared to transthoracic echocardiography. In more than 600 patients, a mean r value of 0.89 is calculated (Table 1) when comparing AVA sizing by CT with TTE.…”
Section: The Heart Valves and Its Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to fast technical developments of CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), these imaging modalities are gaining ground in the evaluation of the cardiac valves [47]. Studies show that the planimetric measurements of AVA by Dual-Source CT (DSCT) are very well correlated with the measurements done by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE).…”
Section: Use Of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography In Therapeutic Management Of Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%