Moving towards a far-away goal is a continuous challenge for many animal species, given that goal-oriented actions are an integral part of different aspects of their everyday life. In the fields of ethology and ecology, their homing and migratory behaviours are certainly one of the best studied and, at the same time, the most familiar examples of spatial movements, daily or seasonally performed across lands or seas, by a variety of vertebrate and invertebrate forms. These movements, often performed over short distances -such as the daily foraging journey of a desert ant -or over greater ones -like the non-stop journeys of birds over oceans -are characterized by a proper abilities of spatial orientation. They are based on cues of different kinds, and include various mechanisms and modalities, depending to a different extent on individual experience or genetic information. The latter are essential for some kinds of migratory behaviours, such as those of certain shore-line crustaceans (Pardi et al. 1958) or the yearlings of passerine birds on their first migratory course (Berthold 1999), both guided by inherited information not implemented by previous experiences.For long-distance orientation, to select and maintain a given course, the use of compass mechanisms becomes crucial, while finding the proper course to a goal starting from an unknown site, requires the ability of so-called "true navigation". For that purpose, an individual must rely on local cues to realize the goal direction, to be selected then by means of a compass. This way to intend true navigation is linked to Kramer's "map and compass" concept that assumed that the performance of navigation is achieved in two independent steps (Kramer 1961). The first consists of establishing the geographic position of the starting point relative to the intended far-away goal, including its direction (the map constituent). The second step consists of selecting and maintaining the deduced course by means of a compass mechanism.According to Papi (1992), two different types of map can be distinguished. The first consists of a system of local cues constituted by an array of familiar landmarks, each of them associated with its direction with respect to the intended goal, giving the direction to the goal itself as a compass course (mosaic map navigation, sensu Wiltschko & Wiltschko 1982). In particular over far and unknown sites, the mechanism of the second type must work on the basis of a comparison of the value of cues