2019
DOI: 10.1017/cel.2019.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland

Abstract: This article explains why autocrats love constitutional pluralism and constitutional identity. Though these concepts were developed by scholars and jurists with the best of intentions in mind, we explain why they are also attractive to and inherently prone to abuse by autocrats. We then describe how the regimes in Hungary and Poland have made use of these concepts in their drive to consolidate autocracy. We conclude that given the dangers inherent in constitutional pluralism and its susceptibility to abuse, it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both Poland and Hungary there were attacks on checks and balances, the independence of the judiciary, and control of public administration [Bakke, Sitter 2020]. Poland and Hungary have both utilised the twin concepts of constitutional identity and constitutional pluralism, notable instances include Hungary blatantly violating the EU asylum acquis and refusing to recognise the primacy of EU law in this domain, or Poland attacking the independence of the judiciary, claiming that such matters fall within the exclusive bounds of its authority and citing scholars of constitutional pluralism and the EU's "national identity clause" [Kelemen, Pech 2019].…”
Section: From Consolidated To Backsliding Democraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both Poland and Hungary there were attacks on checks and balances, the independence of the judiciary, and control of public administration [Bakke, Sitter 2020]. Poland and Hungary have both utilised the twin concepts of constitutional identity and constitutional pluralism, notable instances include Hungary blatantly violating the EU asylum acquis and refusing to recognise the primacy of EU law in this domain, or Poland attacking the independence of the judiciary, claiming that such matters fall within the exclusive bounds of its authority and citing scholars of constitutional pluralism and the EU's "national identity clause" [Kelemen, Pech 2019].…”
Section: From Consolidated To Backsliding Democraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like its CEE counterparts, PSD undermined the country's constitutionalism through its parliamentary majority (c.f. Kelemen & Pech, 2019;Tćth, 2017), packed the Supreme Court and lower courts with loyalists, and challenged the forms and rhetoric of law (Krygier, 2019).…”
Section: The Rule Of Law Institutions and The Romanian Politics In 2015-2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical attack of this kind can be found in Lenin's 1917 attacks against "formality": 38 Reasoned Proposal in Accordance with Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union regarding the Rule of Law in Poland, paragraph 173. See Kelemen and Pech (2019). 39 See Pech and Scheppele (2017), who present an excellent overview of the European Commission's actions against Poland in 2016 and 2017.…”
Section: The Nature Of the Political Attack On The Rule Of Law In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%