EMG Methods for Evaluating Muscle and Nerve Function 2012
DOI: 10.5772/25757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usefulness of Wavelet Transform to Reduce Noise in the SEMG Signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, EMG signals are acquired by surface electrodes that are placed on the skin superimposed on the targeted muscle. In order to use the EMG signal as a diagnosis signal or a control signal, a feature is often extracted before performing analysis or classification stage (Phinyomark et al, 2012a) because a lot of information, both useful information and noise (Phinyomark et al, 2012b), is contained in the raw EMG data. An EMG feature is a distinct characteristic of the signal that can be described or observed quantitatively, such as being large or small, spiky or smooth, and fast or slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Normally, EMG signals are acquired by surface electrodes that are placed on the skin superimposed on the targeted muscle. In order to use the EMG signal as a diagnosis signal or a control signal, a feature is often extracted before performing analysis or classification stage (Phinyomark et al, 2012a) because a lot of information, both useful information and noise (Phinyomark et al, 2012b), is contained in the raw EMG data. An EMG feature is a distinct characteristic of the signal that can be described or observed quantitatively, such as being large or small, spiky or smooth, and fast or slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyse the EMG signals during dynamic movements, the effects of muscle force and muscle geometry (joint angle) should have paid more attention (Cechetto et al, 2001;Doheny et al, 2008). In the literature, such effects on MNF and MDF have still been inconclusive (Doheny et al, 2008;Phinyomark et al, 2012c). A summary of the conflicting results mentioned in the literature is also presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Angkoon Limsakul 2012)(Hussain et al, in 2009) proposed db2, db6, db8, dmey, sym8, sym4 and sym 5 wavelet functions with decomposition level 4 and universal scaling with hard threshold function to determine the muscles contraction. For the feature selection from different hand functions, Phinyomark et al, (Angkoon Phinyomark, Phukpattaranont, and Limsakul 2012) Limsakul, C. & Phukpattaranont 2008; Angkoon Phinyomark, Phukpattaranont, and Limsakul 2012) summarized that the best performance can be obtained from db2 with level 2 and db7 with the decomposition level 4. But in (Megahed et al 2008;Reaz, M. B. I.;Hussain, M. S. & Mohd-Yasin 2006) the researchers recommended for the wavelet functions as db2, db7, sym2, sym5, coif 4, bior5.5 and bior 2.2 with the decomposition level 4 for de-noising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%