2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The usefulness of ultrasound before induction of labor

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the created model had greater sensitivity and specificity of effective IOL prediction compared with the BS (sensitivity 77% vs. 65%, specificity 93% vs. 86%) [ 8 ]. Several other models that were based on ultrasound parameters, such as estimated fetal weight, cervical length, PCA, AoP, head-to-perineum distance, and fetal occiput position, have been described in the literature with varying reported results [ 9 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the created model had greater sensitivity and specificity of effective IOL prediction compared with the BS (sensitivity 77% vs. 65%, specificity 93% vs. 86%) [ 8 ]. Several other models that were based on ultrasound parameters, such as estimated fetal weight, cervical length, PCA, AoP, head-to-perineum distance, and fetal occiput position, have been described in the literature with varying reported results [ 9 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other elements used concerned the presenting part of the fetus (angle of progression (AoP), posterior cervical angle (PCA), head-to-peritoneum distance (HPD), head–symphysis distance (HSD), and position of the occiput of the fetus) and its estimated weight. The study also evaluated the anatomical parameters of the pelvis [ 8 , 9 ]. The usefulness of the abovementioned parameters alone and in complex predictive models was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Наиболее часто для определения этих понятий используют частоту влагалищных родов, спонтанных влагалищных родов, родоразрешения в первые 24 ч от начала мероприятий [4,[25][26][27][28][29]. Частота неуспеха преиндукции (отсутствие созревания шейки матки) составила по нашим данным 2,47%, в то же время в нашем исследовании не было ни одного наблюдения отсутствия эффекта от родовозбуждения окситоцином после достижения «зрелости» шейки матки.…”
Section: прегравидарная подготовка и беременностьunclassified
“…In addition to the risk of failed IOL, this practice could be associated with some undesired outcomes, such as longer labor stages and excessive uterine contractions, which may raise the risk of uterine rupture, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and birth asphyxia, as well as the need for cesarean section (C/S) and instrumental births [ 6 ]. Furthermore, IOL might lead to a substantial economic burden and inconvenience for parturients due to their restricted mobility and continuous fetal heart rate monitoring [ 7 ]. Likewise, misusing oxytocin and prostaglandins usually administered for IOL can result in adverse perinatal outcomes [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%