2013
DOI: 10.21848/audiol.2013.9.1.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usefulness of Sound-Field Auditory Steady State Response (SF ASSR): Comparison of Hearing Sensitivity and Typical ASSR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main finding that emerged from this study is that the ASSR level indeed was reduced for the nonanechoic room conditions compared with the reference anechoic condition. This is a novel finding as the effect of room acoustics on ASSR level has not been systematically investigated in previous studies, which have been mostly focused on testing the viability of ASSR measurements in sound field for hearing assessment and hearing-aid fitting validation (Damarla & Manjula, 2007; Hernandez-Perez & Torres-Fortuny, 2013; Park et al., 2013; Picton et al., 1998; Sardari et al., 2015; Shemesh et al., 2012; Stroebel et al., 2007; Selim et al., 2012). The reduction in the ASSR level for the room conditions was ascribed to smaller stimulus modulations for the measured nonanechoic conditions (see Figure 2B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main finding that emerged from this study is that the ASSR level indeed was reduced for the nonanechoic room conditions compared with the reference anechoic condition. This is a novel finding as the effect of room acoustics on ASSR level has not been systematically investigated in previous studies, which have been mostly focused on testing the viability of ASSR measurements in sound field for hearing assessment and hearing-aid fitting validation (Damarla & Manjula, 2007; Hernandez-Perez & Torres-Fortuny, 2013; Park et al., 2013; Picton et al., 1998; Sardari et al., 2015; Shemesh et al., 2012; Stroebel et al., 2007; Selim et al., 2012). The reduction in the ASSR level for the room conditions was ascribed to smaller stimulus modulations for the measured nonanechoic conditions (see Figure 2B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the studies that investigated sound-field ASSR for hearing-aid fitting validation did not assess the effect of the testing room on the ASSR. Most of these studies only reported the listening environments to be sound-treated-rooms (e.g., Hernandez-Perez & Torres-Fortuny, 2013; Park et al., 2013; Picton et al., 1998; Sardari et al., 2015; Shemesh et al., 2012) with low background noise according to the standard ANSI S3.1 (ANSI S3.1., 2003; e.g., Park et al., 2013; Picton et al., 1998; Sardari et al., 2015), and no information about the reverberation time of the rooms was provided. To understand the effect of the room on sound-field ASSR is crucial, as the reverberation and background noise of the room in which the test is carried out can distort the acoustic stimulus modulation (Houtgast et al., 1980; Plomp, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation