2002
DOI: 10.21000/jasmr02010798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Wetlands to Remove Nickel From Mine Drainage - Is Perpetual Treatment Really Possible?

Abstract: Although wetland treatment systems have been shown to be effective for treating both coal and metal mine drainage, the longevity of the treatment has always been a question. Data collected from a wetland in northeastern Minnesota suggests it may be possible to build a wetland that will provide long term treatment. A 7000 square meter overland flow wetland was built in 1992 to treat a mine drainage with an av798798erage pH of 7.2 and an average nickel concentration of 5.1 mg/L. Nickel removal exceeded 90% for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of Ni concentration were due to several reasons including phytoremediation mechanisms (phytodegradation, phytoextraction, phytostabilization) [21] and physical mechanisms (adsorption, precipitating) [22]. Ni removal percentages were calculated for each week within different mass ratios (0, 2,800, 34,000) and three concentrations throughout 21 days.…”
Section: Ni Removal From Water In Sub-surface Batch System (Ssb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of Ni concentration were due to several reasons including phytoremediation mechanisms (phytodegradation, phytoextraction, phytostabilization) [21] and physical mechanisms (adsorption, precipitating) [22]. Ni removal percentages were calculated for each week within different mass ratios (0, 2,800, 34,000) and three concentrations throughout 21 days.…”
Section: Ni Removal From Water In Sub-surface Batch System (Ssb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By revegetating the stockpile and reducing the total flow, the estimated lifetime of the system has doubled. Using a model developed for the W1D wetland, this wetland should generate enough metal removal sites each year to balance about ½ of the estimated annual metal load to the wetland and as a result the lifetime can be calculated to be on the order of 400 years (Eger et al, 2002).…”
Section: W2d/3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the wetland was built to treat the volume and quality of drainage flow from the stockpile prior to reclamation, the decrease in flow and concentration has dramatically increased the projected lifetime of the system. Currently there appears to be an approximate balance between the annual production of new removal sites and the annual input of nickel, which suggests that the wetland should be capable of treating the drainage in perpetuity (Eger et al, 2002) Seep X Seep X originates from the 8013 stockpile that was reclaimed in 1991. Since the wetland was constructed in 1995, the flow into the wetland has averaged about 100 L/min.…”
Section: W1dmentioning
confidence: 99%