2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of vegetation index via remote sensing allows estimation of soybean application rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data captured from UAVs is expressed using indices, including the vegetation index. Souza et al (2020) used active and passive sensors to obtain vegetation index maps to assess crop growth. The electromagnetic spectrum is a range of all types of electromagnetic radiation based on frequency and wavelength.…”
Section: Vegetation Indices For Paddy Growth Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data captured from UAVs is expressed using indices, including the vegetation index. Souza et al (2020) used active and passive sensors to obtain vegetation index maps to assess crop growth. The electromagnetic spectrum is a range of all types of electromagnetic radiation based on frequency and wavelength.…”
Section: Vegetation Indices For Paddy Growth Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this range, studies have shown increased spray deposition with increased [2] or decreased [3] application rates for perennial plants. In annual plants, different results in deposition and control efficacy have also been reported at different application rates and droplet sizes [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing different application rates, reports of increased deposition with higher (Derksen et al, 2008) and lower rates (Alves et al, 2020) were found, but the latter was also related with an increased droplet size (Fritz et al, 2006). The application rate should be regulated according to the crop foliage spray retention capacity; exceeding this level may result in runoff from the upper third of the field, with part of the spray still retaining in the lower third (Souza et al, 2020) or in the runoff to soil (Cunha et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%