Bioequivalence studies of drugs with a long half-life require long periods of time for pharmacokinetic sampling. The latest update of the European guideline allows the area under the curve (AUC) truncated at 72 hr to be used as an alternative to AUC 0-t as the primary parameter. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of truncating the AUC at 48, 24 and 12 hr on the acceptance of the bioequivalence criterion as compared with truncation at 72 hr in bioequivalence trials. The effect of truncated AUC on the within-individual coefficient of variation (CV w ) and on the ratio of the formulations was also analysed. Twenty-eight drugs were selected from bioequivalence trials. Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using WinNonLin 2.0 based on the trapezoidal method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to obtain the ratios and 90% confidence intervals for AUC at different time-points. The degree of agreement of AUC 0-72 in relation to AUC 0-48 and AUC 0-24 , according to the Landis and Koch classification, was 'almost perfect'. Statistically significant differences were observed when the CV w of AUC truncated at 72, 48 and 24 hr was compared with the CV w of AUC 0-12 . There were no statistically significant differences in the AUC ratio at any time-point. Compared to AUC 0-72 , Pearson's correlation coefficient for mean AUC, AUC ratio and AUC CV w was worse for AUC 0-12 than AUC 0-24 or AUC 0-48 . These preliminary results could suggest that AUC truncation at 24 or 48 hr is adequate to determine whether two formulations are bioequivalent.The European guidelines for conducting bioequivalence studies of immediate-release formulations state that two formulations are bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the means for the pharmacokinetic parameters (area under the plasma concentration curve from administration to the last observed concentration at time t [AUC 0-t ] and maximum plasma concentration [C max ]) of the test and reference formulations is within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00% [1,2]. In the case of drugs with a long half-life, the latest update of these guidelines proposes truncating the AUC at 72 hr (AUC 0-72 ) as an alternative to calculating the AUC 0-t for comparison of the extent of exposure, as the absorption phase is completed during the first 72 hr [1]. Furthermore, the absorption phase of a drug in its plasma concentration versus time is more sensitive and decisive and enables better detection of the differences between formulations before the drug is completely eliminated [3]. Therefore, a sampling period longer than 72 hr is not necessary for immediate-release formulations, irrespective of half-life [1].Complete absorption of the drug formulation occurs mostly within the first 24 hr; therefore, truncation of the AUC at 24 or 48 hr as the primary parameter should be enough. Moreover, as absorption is the most relevant parameter in shorter AUCs, these intervals could be more sensitive for calculating differences between formulations.An AUC t...