2018
DOI: 10.3233/rnn-170801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities

Abstract: Neuroplasticity is a fundamental yet relatively unexplored process that can impact rehabilitation of lower extremity (LE) movements. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has gained widespread application as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for evaluating neuroplasticity of the corticospinal pathway. However, a majority of TMS studies have been performed on hand muscles, with a paucity of TMS investigations focused on LE muscles. This perspective review paper proposes that there are unique methodol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(231 reference statements)
5
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a figure-of-eight coil to stimulate the leg motor cortex. Although a double-cone coil is more conventional to stimulate the leg motor cortex as the magnetic stimulus penetrates less deeply for a given intensity [57], the figureof-eight coil takes the advantage to be more focal [58], and there is no clear rationale to give priority to one over the other in the literature [57]. Apart from these considerations, some strict procedures helped us to increase the validity of the data provided by the figure-of-eight coil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a figure-of-eight coil to stimulate the leg motor cortex. Although a double-cone coil is more conventional to stimulate the leg motor cortex as the magnetic stimulus penetrates less deeply for a given intensity [57], the figureof-eight coil takes the advantage to be more focal [58], and there is no clear rationale to give priority to one over the other in the literature [57]. Apart from these considerations, some strict procedures helped us to increase the validity of the data provided by the figure-of-eight coil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that the CS excitability changes observed in Exp 1 and 2 were not specific to MEPs elicited in a hand muscle, we targeted the TA muscle of the right leg in Exp 3. MEPs are more difficult to elicit from leg muscles: Not only is the leg region in the depth of the sulcal, but the motor representations of leg muscles may contain fewer or weaker corticospinal projections (Kesar et al 2018). Given this challenge, the thresholding phase of Exp 3 also served as a screening procedure: We recruited 23 participants to identify 12 individuals for whom we were able to consistently elicit MEPs in the right TA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite our best efforts in targeting the quadriceps femoris muscle for stimulation, EMG, and especially peak forces, were generally low. Stimulating muscles of the lower limb with TMS can be difficult, as the somatotopic organization of the motor cortex results in a smaller specific area suitable for stimulation for muscles of the thigh compared with, for example, hand muscles (25). This was exemplified by a relatively high degree of activation of both antagonists at the level of the knee joint (BF) and in the lower leg (TA, Gn) in addition to the intended quadriceps muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%