1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(97)00102-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the salivagram in the evaluation of severe and chronic aspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VF and/or Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are the gold standards to evaluate swallowing in dysphagic patients. Scintigraphic assessment of swallowing, such as oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy, salivagram, etc., is also available for the analysis of swallowing, especially to detect silent aspiration [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, simple assessment methods, such as a bedside clinical test to predict aspiration, will be useful if available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VF and/or Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are the gold standards to evaluate swallowing in dysphagic patients. Scintigraphic assessment of swallowing, such as oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy, salivagram, etc., is also available for the analysis of swallowing, especially to detect silent aspiration [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. However, simple assessment methods, such as a bedside clinical test to predict aspiration, will be useful if available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radionuclide salivagram has proven to be a sensitive and simple method for detecting pulmonary aspiration of oral contents (46)(47)(48). No patient preparation is required for the salivagram.…”
Section: Pulmonary Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspiration into the distal airways suggests a more worrisome outcome than proximal aspiration. The whole-body radiation dose to the patient is approximately 0.05 mSv (5 mrem), whereas barium swallow delivers a higher radiation dose (46)(47)(48).…”
Section: Pulmonary Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three retrospective reports [67][68][69] have shown a 26-28% prevalence of positive salivagrams in children suspected of aspiration, but no other confirmatory tests were performed. In one study evaluating the ability of salivagrams to predict the need for laryngotracheal separation, no correlation was found between salivagram result and days hospitalised owing to respiratory symptoms [70]. Radionuclide salivagrams show poor agreement with other tests for aspiration [66].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Salivary Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%