2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.imic.2013.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the Māori language in species nomenclature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is therefore no link between folk taxonomy and the scientific classification of pigeonpea. Since there could be a connection between folk taxonomy and scientific classification of the species [37], our findings are contrary to Akohoué et al [14] on Kersting's groundnut in Benin. However, the hierarchical characterization of pigeonpea folk taxonomy was like the observation made by Loko et al [38] on common beans and reflects the high diversity level of pigeonpea in the surveyed sociolinguistic groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…There is therefore no link between folk taxonomy and the scientific classification of pigeonpea. Since there could be a connection between folk taxonomy and scientific classification of the species [37], our findings are contrary to Akohoué et al [14] on Kersting's groundnut in Benin. However, the hierarchical characterization of pigeonpea folk taxonomy was like the observation made by Loko et al [38] on common beans and reflects the high diversity level of pigeonpea in the surveyed sociolinguistic groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing that it could have correspondence between folk taxonomy and scientific classification of the species [37], our findings are contrary to those of Akohoué et al [14] on Kersting's groundnut in Benin. However, the hierarchical characterization of pigeonpea folk taxonomy was similar to that observed by Loko et al [38] on common bean and reflects the high diversity level of pigeonpea in the surveyed sociolinguistic groups. Our result in Adja sociolinguistic group infraspecific pigeonpea taxa was contrary to that of Ayenan et al [9] and Zavinon et al [11] who distinguished respectively 2 and 3 infra-specific pigeonpea taxa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Kersting's groundnut in Benin. However, the hierarchical characterization of pigeonpea folk taxonomy was similar to that observed by Loko et al [38] on common bean and reflects the high diversity level of pigeonpea in the surveyed sociolinguistic groups. Our finding in Adja sociolinguistic group infraspecific pigeonpea taxa was contrary to those of Ayenan et al [9] and Zavinon et al [11] who distinguished respectively 2 and 3 infra-specific pigeonpea taxa.…”
Section: ] Onsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, specific knowledge relative to the plant part uses might be kept and transmitted within communities in some areas as a result of vertical knowledge transmission [54,14]. Knowing that integrating cultural practices of local communities permit an efficient on farm conservation [55,38], this specific use category of pigeonpea genetic resource show the potentiality of cultural approach for the conservation of this legume in Benin.…”
Section: ] Onmentioning
confidence: 99%