2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the LARS artificial ligament to augment a short or undersized ACL hamstrings tendon graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean follow-up period ranged from 18 months to a maximum of five years. One study used LARS as an augmentation to short or thin hamstring autograft [5] rather than a sole constituent of the graft. This study also used a variety of techniques including bioabsorbable screws, single and double bundle reconstructions plus suspensory fixation which is not recommended by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean follow-up period ranged from 18 months to a maximum of five years. One study used LARS as an augmentation to short or thin hamstring autograft [5] rather than a sole constituent of the graft. This study also used a variety of techniques including bioabsorbable screws, single and double bundle reconstructions plus suspensory fixation which is not recommended by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 156 articles were excluded for one or more exclusion criteria: no full text available (n02), abstract or full text review revealing the article was not relevant (n0126), foreign language article for which no English translation was readily available (n030), evidence of data replication (n013) and studies relating to first-or secondgeneration devices not comparable to LARS (n037). Nine studies were included in the final review [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of artificial ligaments has been discussed critically in the literature [7,9], LARS™ ligaments (Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System, Surgical Implants and Devices, Arc-sur-Tille, France) has been reported to be a suitable material for ACL reconstruction [3,5,[9][10][11][12]. As if history would repeat itself, clinical results in the long-term are again lacking in the literature to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the LARS™ system as a suitable graft for the reconstruction of the ACL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LARS artificial ligament (Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System, Surgical Implants and Devices, Arc-sur-Tille, France), made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), has been accepted as a graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by many surgeons all over the world [1][2][3]. It is a valid alternative for treating some acute and serious cases [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%