2003
DOI: 10.1080/1354850031000087591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to estimate prevalence of psychiatric disorder in early pregnancy

Abstract: The use of the 28-item version of the General Health Questionnaire as a means of determining prevalence of psychiatric disorders in early pregnancy is described. Two hundred and seventy-three women attending their first antenatal appointment completed the instrument. Positive cases identified by both the GHQ scoring method (cut-off score 5/6) and the Likert method (cut-off score 23/24) were compared. Using the GHQ method, 44.3% of the women scored 5 or above; 50.5% scored 4 or above. Using the Likert method, 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
38
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two methods of scoring the questionnaire: the GHQ scaling method (0, 0, 1, 1) and the Likert scaling method (0, 1, 2, 3). The former is appropriate for recognizing nonpsychotic psychiatric cases and the latter for survey research (Swallow, Lindow, Masson, and Hay, 2003). For differentiating psychiatric from nonpsychiatric cases the GHQ scoring system with a cutoff point of 4 or more is usually used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two methods of scoring the questionnaire: the GHQ scaling method (0, 0, 1, 1) and the Likert scaling method (0, 1, 2, 3). The former is appropriate for recognizing nonpsychotic psychiatric cases and the latter for survey research (Swallow, Lindow, Masson, and Hay, 2003). For differentiating psychiatric from nonpsychiatric cases the GHQ scoring system with a cutoff point of 4 or more is usually used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STAI: ‘I feel rested’ or ‘I feel comfortable’). These may inflate anxiety scores in postpartum populations (Meades and Ayers 2011) and increase the likelihood of false positives (Swallow et al 2003). Furthermore, symptoms of anxiety occurring in the postpartum may have distinct presentations which are not encompassed by items in general scales (Meades and Ayers 2011; Phillips et al 2009); this limitation has been addressed when examining anxieties occurring in pregnancy (Van den Bergh 1990; Levin 1991; Wadwha et al 1993; Huizink et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common for measures of anxiety that have been developed for the general population, such as the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Beck and Steer, 1993) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995a), to be used to classify perinatal women according to established severity ranges. However, these measures are limited at indicating the severity of anxiety in the perinatal period because (1) the cut-off scores may not have been validated in perinatal samples, (2) scores may be confounded by physical symptoms that occur commonly in pregnancy or postnatally (Swallow et al, 2003), as scales include items about physical symptoms of anxiety (e.g., 'I experienced breathing difficulty' (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995a), 'discomfort in abdomen', 'difficulty breathing' (Beck Anxiety Inventory;Beck and Steer, 1993)), and (3) pregnancy-specific anxieties (e.g., severe fear of childbirth) are not addressed. Measures developed to assess perinatal anxiety, such as the Pregnancy Anxiety Scale (Levin, 1991), Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire ( Van den Bergh, 1989), and Pregnancy Related Anxiety Scale (Wadhwa et al, 1993), are also limited at indicating severity of anxiety in the perinatal period because they assess narrow domains of perinatal anxiety such as the mother's fears about the birth, the pregnancy and the baby's health and safety (see Somerville et al (2014) for summary).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%