1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf01419938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the computer in analyzing student essays

Abstract: par MURRAY TONDOW, Palo Alto, USA Cet article est en premier lieu un compte rendu d6taill6 de l'organisation et de la fonction des ordinateurs utilis6s dans la circonscription de Palo Alto en Californie. -L'auteur est d'avis que la technologic et, partant, l'ordinateur sont aussi bien la cause que la cons6quence de la r6volution qui bouleverse actuellement la science. I1 en arrive ~ la conclusion qu'avec le recours de plus en plus fr6quent aux ordinateurs, ceux-ci deviennent de plus en plus indispensables au b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the broader field of educational technology, there has been quite a lot of research on using language technologies more generally, especially in the areas of automatic essay grading (Burstein et al 1998(Burstein et al , 2001Page 1968;Page and Petersen 1995;Landauer and Dumais 1997;Foltz et al 1998;Laham 2000) and tutorial dialogue systems (Graesser et al 1998;Rosé et al 2001;Aleven et al 2003;Evens and Michael 2003;Litman et al 2006;VanLehn et al 2007). What is different about the work presented here is that we focus on an analysis of the process of conversation rather than the content.…”
Section: Application Of Text Classification Approaches In Csclmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the broader field of educational technology, there has been quite a lot of research on using language technologies more generally, especially in the areas of automatic essay grading (Burstein et al 1998(Burstein et al , 2001Page 1968;Page and Petersen 1995;Landauer and Dumais 1997;Foltz et al 1998;Laham 2000) and tutorial dialogue systems (Graesser et al 1998;Rosé et al 2001;Aleven et al 2003;Evens and Michael 2003;Litman et al 2006;VanLehn et al 2007). What is different about the work presented here is that we focus on an analysis of the process of conversation rather than the content.…”
Section: Application Of Text Classification Approaches In Csclmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Office of Education, Page and Paulus (see Page 1966Page , 1968aPage , 1968b for sununarizations of tbis work) developed techniques for scoring essays and for providing instructional feedback to students through computer analysis of essays. Indices were developed that predicted judgmental scores through a procedure adapted from Diederich's (1974) analytic scoring procedure.…”
Section: Technological Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature with regards to ATS systems of text produced by nonnative English-language learners (Page, 1968;Attali and Burstein, 2006;Rudner and Liang, 2002;Elliot, 2003;Landauer et al, 2003;Briscoe et al, 2010;Yannakoudakis et al, 2011;Sakaguchi et al, 2015, among others), overviews of which can be found in various studies (Williamson, 2009;Dikli, 2006;Shermis and Hammer, 2012). Implicitly or explicitly, previous work has primarily treated text scoring as a supervised text classification task, and has utilized a large selection of techniques, ranging from the use of syntactic parsers, via vectorial semantics combined with dimensionality reduction, to generative and discriminative machine learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%