2008
DOI: 10.1080/14789940701560794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of telepsychiatry within forensic practice: A literature review on the use of videolink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight reviews were excluded for poor quality (QS<22). 1,13,[44][45][46][47][48][49] Two reviews had no quantifiable telepsychiatry content [50][51] , one focused only on forensic telepsychiatry 52 and one was a thesis with insufficient information to assess the quality of the review. 53 In addition, three of these reviews were updated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight reviews were excluded for poor quality (QS<22). 1,13,[44][45][46][47][48][49] Two reviews had no quantifiable telepsychiatry content [50][51] , one focused only on forensic telepsychiatry 52 and one was a thesis with insufficient information to assess the quality of the review. 53 In addition, three of these reviews were updated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-way audiovisual interaction between or among remote sites renders the VC technology more amenable to legal uses, such as for cross-examination, witness testament, and also for forensic assessment purposes, including determining competence to stand trial (Manguno-Mire et al, 2007). The technology has also made it easier for emergency psychiatric consultations and also for delivering mental health services to inmates (Khalifa, Saleem, & Stankard, 2008;Nelson, Banitt-Duncan, & Lillis, 2013), and has also been reported to be supportive of family therapy for incarcerated youth (Kaliebe, Heneghan, & Kim, 2011) and for discussing inmates' sensitive issues . Positive outcomes have been reported for treatment provided to inmates via VC (Antonacci, Bloch, Saeed, Yildirim, & Talley, 2008;Fox, Connor, McCullers, & Waters, 2008).…”
Section: Abstract Forensic Assessment Forensic Mental Health Evaluatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, from a clinical perspective, the pressing and lingering question relates to whether VCgenerated assessment reports produced for the courts would be comparable to or could supersede the traditional face-to-face medium. Although VC is comprehensively supportive of forensic assessment (Brett & Blumberg, 2006;Saleem & Stankard, 2006), forensic consultations and treatments (e.g., Khalifa et al, 2008;Nelson et al, 2013), discussing inmates' sensitive issues , and remote testaments (e.g., United States v. Guild, 2008), it is worth noting that the characteristics that make VC suitable for these services starkly contrast with those required for assessment endeavors. Illustrating, in its simplistic form, a secure and stable Internet connection, Downloaded by [New York University] at 21:13 19 July 2015 and using VC equipment with well-functioning and high-quality audiovisual systems are presumably enough for a remote witness to testify during criminal proceedings.…”
Section: Abstract Forensic Assessment Forensic Mental Health Evaluatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three papers have come from one group 4,13,14 , who introduced a forensic telepsychiatry service in Nottingham in 2005, with 30 assessments in the first year. 14 There are no reports of patient and clinician satisfaction when using videoconferencing for assessing adjudicative competence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%