The use of technology for urgent clinician to clinician communications: A systematic review of the literature

Abstract

Objective Urgent clinician-clinician communications require routes of contact that are fast and dependable, and allow for the exchange of complex information. Despite the increasing focus on improving healthcare delivery systems over the past decade, few studies have examined the role of technology in clinician-clinician communication. The aim of this study was to review the literature examining the role of devices and technology in facilitating urgent clinician-clinician communication to identify critical areas for future research. Materials and Methods A search of Pub Med was performed using the terms ((((“Critical Care”[Mesh] OR “urgent”)))) AND (((hospital communication systems[MeSH Terms]) OR health communication[MeSH Terms]) OR interdisciplinary communication[MeSH Terms]). Commentaries and editorials were excluded. Results The initial search returned 272 articles, which were reviewed to identify articles describing: (1) the role of technological support or devices in clinician-clinician communication, (2) technology-based interventions that improved clinician-to-clinician communication in hospitals or acute care facilities related to critically ill patients, or (3) critical information exchange. A total of 16 articles were included in the final review. These were grouped into three categories: alphanumeric pagers; cellular and smart telephones; and novel uses of technology. Discussion Breakdowns in clinician-clinician communication are complex and cannot be solved through the implementation of devices or technologically advanced systems alone. It is essential to understand the correlation between emerging technologies, a demanding workload, and clinician-clinician interaction. Enhanced communication of clinical ideas, opportunities for team discussion, and a sense of partnership and support require not just increased information, but enhanced delivery.

Bring Your Own Mobile Device (BYOD) to the Hospital: Layered Boundary Barriers and Divergent Boundary Management Strategies

“…Hospitals have a long history of using pagers to address local mobility issues because pagers are relatively inexpensive and function as a call alert system [24]. Yet several recent studies suggest that mobiles do more than simply replace pagers for healthcare professionals [25][26][27]. Specifically, mobiles decrease wait times for responses, thus improving the pace of medical decision-making [16,27].…”

Optimizing Patient Surgical Management UsingWhatsAppApplication in the Italian Healthcare System

“…[27][28][29][30][31] Moreover, evidences have shown that communication between physicians of different specialties and training level is essential to provide optimal patient care. [32][33][34] In contrast, poor communication is the number one root cause of delays in patient treatment and the second leading cause of operative/postoperative complications. 35,36 Recent studies have shown different forms of speed communication in acute medical or surgical conditions within the same team in the hospital [37][38][39] ; however, few studies have evaluated the potential use of electronic communication between surgical teams located at very long distances.…”

Turning the page on hospital communications slowly

“…It should be noted that there is a lack of evidence that improving communication improves care 13. This may damper the enthusiasm for some to improve communication.…”