The Use of Teaching Associates for Knee and Shoulder Examination: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis

Zabel, J.P.; Sterz, Jasmina; Hoefer, Sebastian; Stefanescu, Maria-Christina; Lehmann, Marieke; Sakmen, Dennis K.; Marzi, Ingo; Ruesseler, Miriam

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.03.006

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The positive influence of feedback from SPs on learning success has been shown in numerous studies ( 7 , 11 , 22 , 23 ). In qualitative studies, for example, students reported that they found the feedback from SPs more useful than that from RPs ( 7 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…Good acceptance of SPs and the positive influence of SP use on knowledge acquisition and behavior change in learners has been proven ( 9 , 10 ). For example, Zabel et al showed that undergraduate medical students performed a knee or shoulder examination significantly better if they trained this examination on a SP who provided feedback than if they trained together under the supervision of a surgeon ( 11 ). Additionally, Herbstreit et al showed that medical students performed slightly but significantly better when handling medical emergencies after they were trained using SPs compared with a traditional seminar cohort ( 12 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of using simulated or real patients on undergraduate medical students acquiring competencies in medical conversations in surgery: A prospective, controlled study

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCommunication with patients and their relatives as well as with colleagues and students is an essential part of every physician's daily work. An established method for teaching communication skills is using simulated patients (SPs). However, teaching with SPs is often subjectively perceived by medical students as less instructive than teaching with real patients (RPs). Studies that analyze the influence of SPs compared to RPs for acquiring competencies are lacking. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the impact of SPs on long-term learning success for communication skills compared to RPs.Material and MethodsStudy participants were undergraduate third-year medical students who attended a communication unit and were randomized into three groups. The first group trained the role-play part with a SP (SP-group). The second group trained with a SP but thought that the patient was a RP because the students and the tutors were told that they were a RP by the principal investigator (incognito patient group [IP-group]). The third group and their tutors trained with a RP and were told that the patient was a RP (real patient group [RP-group]). Five to 12 weeks after completing the training, the study participants completed a curricular summative objective standardized clinical examination.ResultsThere were 146 students who participated in the study. There were no significant differences between the three study groups at the informed consent stations and for those conducting anamnesis interviews.ConclusionCommunication skills training with SPs appears to be equivalent to training with RPs in terms of competency development in communication-based assessments in surgery. Therefore, SPs should be used in these curricula, especially at an early stage, to enable the students to practice adequate communication skills.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of using simulated or real patients on undergraduate medical students acquiring competencies in medical conversations in surgery: A prospective, controlled study

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Case‐based teaching was compared to bedside teaching in a randomized controlled trial, and results concluded there was no difference in the average final OSCE score between each of the groups; however, case‐based teaching was well received by the students 65 . The benefit of a teaching associate was demonstrated in 1 study with significantly better clinical skills performances when compared to peer and instructor led examination 66 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although this study was underpowered, it did show a significant benefit of an interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal education, a concept which is gaining momentum within medical education throughout a number of disciplines, largely due to its assimilation to the professional working environment. The benefit of teaching associates was also only evaluated in 1 study, again demonstrating significant benefit in terms of clinical skills acquisition 66 . The use of teaching associates utilizes multimodal feedback, with demonstrated benefit in motor learning and clinical skills acquisition 66 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Musculoskeletal education in undergraduate medical curricula–A systematic review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases encompass a vast spectrum of up to 200 conditions that are increasingly prevalent, with significant associated disability and socioeconomic burden. Their impact is pervasive, with musculoskeletal conditions being the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide, in addition to the 9th most common cause of disability-adjusted life years. It is therefore imperative that all graduating medical physicians are competent in their management, and that the quality of undergraduate musculoskeletal education is commensurate with patient and societal needs. A systematic literature review was conducted between April 1, 2021 and June 1, 2021 assessing the quality of undergraduate musculoskeletal education in medical schools. Educational interventions in musculoskeletal medicine were also included. Quality assessment appraisal of the studies was done using a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. One thousand and thirty-three titles were screened, and 44 studies were included in the final analysis. Our analysis of these studies showed that the quality of undergraduate musculoskeletal education, as determined by the cognitive mastery and clinical confidence of undergraduate medical students remains inadequate. Multiple educational interventions were assessed with mixed results.Despite the prevalence, and burden associated with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, the musculoskeletal education of undergraduate medical students remains inadequate. Urgent international collaboration is required to devise teaching strategies and curriculum initiatives that are globally and reproducibly applicable and effective. Further research into educational interventions and teaching strategies is also required.

show abstract

“…Approaches to teaching physical examination at both the undergraduate 9 and graduate 10 levels are nonstandardized. Educators have written about innovations using lay teachers, 11 , 12 simulation, 13 near-peer teachers, 14 objective structured clinical examinations, 15 and novel teaching structures at the bedside. 16 , 17 Though curricula exist on teaching necessary psychomotor skills, 18 head-to-toe examination, 19 hypothesis-driven examination, 19 – 21 and evidence-based medicine, 22 , 23 there is not a great deal of literature devoted to teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Teaching Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis: A Workshop for Hospitalists

Kanjee

Tess²

2022

MedEdPORTAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Teaching on physical examination, especially evidence-based physical diagnosis, is at times lacking on general medicine rounds. We created a hospitalist faculty workshop on teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis. Methods The workshop included a systematic approach to teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis, multiple teaching resources, and observed peer teaching. A long-term follow-up session was offered several months after the workshop. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the workshop as well as after the long-term follow-up session. Results Four workshops were conducted and attended by 28 unique participants. Five hospitalists attended long-term follow-up sessions. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, repeat sessions and long-term follow-up were limited. In paired analyses compared to preworkshop, respondents after the workshop reported a higher rate of prioritizing ( p = .008), having a systematic approach to ( p < .001), and confidence in ( p = .001) teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis. Compared to before the workshop, participants after the workshop were able to name more resources to inform teaching of evidence-based physical diagnosis ( p < .001). Informal feedback was positive. Respondents noted that the workshop could be improved by allowing more practice of the actual physical exam maneuvers and more observed teaching. Discussion We created and implemented a workshop to train hospitalists in teaching evidence-based physical diagnosis. This workshop led to improvements in faculty attitudes and teaching skills. Long-term outcomes were limited by low participation due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic.

show abstract

The Use of Teaching Associates for Knee and Shoulder Examination: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 23 publications

Influence of using simulated or real patients on undergraduate medical students acquiring competencies in medical conversations in surgery: A prospective, controlled study

Influence of using simulated or real patients on undergraduate medical students acquiring competencies in medical conversations in surgery: A prospective, controlled study

Musculoskeletal education in undergraduate medical curricula–A systematic review

Teaching Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis: A Workshop for Hospitalists

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About