Low-angle x-ray diffraction diagrams have been recorded from frog sartorius muscles by using synchrotron radiation as a high-intensity x-ray source. This has enabled changes in some of the principal reflections of interest to be followed with a time resolution of 1ims, during small but very rapid length changes imposed on a contracting muscle. The 143-A meridional reflection, which is believed to arise from a repeating pattern ofmyosin crossbridges along the length of the muscle, shows large changes in intensity in these circumstances. During both rapid releases and rapid stretches, by amounts that produce a translation ofactin and myosin filaments past each other by about 100 A and that are completed in about a millisecond (i.e., before significant cross-bridge detachment would be expected), an almost synchronous decrease in 143-A intensity occurs, by 50% or more. This is followed, in the case ofquick releases, by a rapid partial recovery of intensity lasting 5-6 ms (which may represent cross-bridge release and reattachment) and then by a more gradual return to the normal isometric value. Quick stretches show only the slower return of intensity. Immediately after the length change, the initial drop in 143-A intensity can be reversed if the release-(or stretch) is reversed. These changes provide evidence ofa more direct kind than has hitherto been available that the active sliding ofactin filaments past myosin filaments during contraction is produced by longitudinal movement of attached cross-bridges.The outstanding problem in understanding the mechanism of muscular contraction is to discover the nature of the process by which the relative sliding force between actin and myosin filaments is developed. It is generally supposed that the crossbridges, the enzymatically active heads of the myosin molecules, function in a cyclical manner to produce this force. It is thought that they attach to actin in one part of their cycle, then undergo some structural change that enables them to exert tension and, during shortening, to pull the actin along a short distance-probably 100 A or so-towards the center ofthe A-band. They then detach from actin and are recharged by ATP before beginning a new cycle of attachment further out along the actin filament (1, 2). Whilst this general mechanism has been able to give a good account of many phenomena in muscle, it has proved remarkably difficult to produce direct and decisive evidence that the cross-bridges really do behave in this fashion, because of. the inherent difficulty of obtaining dynamic structural information on the size and time scales involved. Moreover, because the processes take place asynchronously at all the cross-bridges, probes of their configuration will usually give only an averaged value of changes in them during the cycle.Surviving muscles give low-angle x-ray diffraction diagrams that contain a considerable amount of information about.-the configuration ofthe cross-bridges and that alter incharacteristic ways during contraction (3-7). The changes in t...