2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of summed radiocarbon probability distributions in archaeology: a review of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
376
2
26

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(98 reference statements)
7
376
2
26
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Hoffmann et al (2013), burial of organic carbon in the lower reaches of a drainage basin is often linked to erosion intensity: generally, the higher intensity of that erosion, then the more organic carbon (including a large amount of radiocarbon-depleted carbon from upstream (Raymond and Bauer, 2001)) is buried on the continental margin contemporaneously. Statistically, because non-systematically collecting/discovering multiple radiocarbon samples (from different locations) is similar to a quasi-random sample of an organic carbon reservoir (Williams, 2012), more radiocarbon samples will be sampled from locations with more abundant organic carbon (these locations have a higher probability of being sampled than in a fully randomised sampling strategy). Also, it is more likely that radiocarbon dating anomalies would occur in these layers, where a considerable amount of radiocarbon-depleted carbon, exposed by increased erosion, was redeposited.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dates As a Source Of Palaeoenvironmental Informamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hoffmann et al (2013), burial of organic carbon in the lower reaches of a drainage basin is often linked to erosion intensity: generally, the higher intensity of that erosion, then the more organic carbon (including a large amount of radiocarbon-depleted carbon from upstream (Raymond and Bauer, 2001)) is buried on the continental margin contemporaneously. Statistically, because non-systematically collecting/discovering multiple radiocarbon samples (from different locations) is similar to a quasi-random sample of an organic carbon reservoir (Williams, 2012), more radiocarbon samples will be sampled from locations with more abundant organic carbon (these locations have a higher probability of being sampled than in a fully randomised sampling strategy). Also, it is more likely that radiocarbon dating anomalies would occur in these layers, where a considerable amount of radiocarbon-depleted carbon, exposed by increased erosion, was redeposited.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dates As a Source Of Palaeoenvironmental Informamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). Because 14 C calibration causes distortions in these types of probability-density plots (Williams, 2012), and because the older part of the 14 C-calibration curve is currently being updated with new Lake Suigetsu varve data (Bronk Ramsey et al, 2012), we have postponed making detailed comparisons between these probability-density graphs and global climate events.…”
Section: Temporal Patterns Of Species Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…14). The Surovell equation fitted to these data describes the rise to present of geological deposits (Surovell et al, 2009;Williams, 2012).…”
Section: How Many Megafauna Were There?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, a time series is constructed that contains information about trends in the frequency of radiocarbon dates, which in turn becomes interpreted as a proxy measurement of past levels of activity. As many authors have pointed out, using the technique uncritically and as a direct proxy is applicable only to broad trends in very large datasets (Chiverrell et al 2011;Contreras and Meadows 2014;Williams 2012). This is because the inherently statistical nature of radiocarbon measurements, together with the non-Gaussian uncertainty introduced by the calibration process, causes artefacts in the resulting curve that could be misinterpreted as Bsignal^but are, in fact, Bnoise^.…”
Section: Summed Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%