1977
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-197708000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of student ratings in multiinstructor courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irby et al (1977) explored the stability of medical student ratings of 14 lectures in a multiinstructor course. They found that (1) immediate postlecture ratings ranked instructors in practically the same order as postcourse ratings (r = .87, p < .001 ), (2) ratings were lower postcourse than immediately postlecture (p < .001), and (3) students were able to continue discriminating among instructors after the passage of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irby et al (1977) explored the stability of medical student ratings of 14 lectures in a multiinstructor course. They found that (1) immediate postlecture ratings ranked instructors in practically the same order as postcourse ratings (r = .87, p < .001 ), (2) ratings were lower postcourse than immediately postlecture (p < .001), and (3) students were able to continue discriminating among instructors after the passage of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…although the effort to use good teaching techniques may generate immediate student enthusiasm, the effect may not be long‐lasting. Although this possibility seems plausible to the authors, one study of immediate versus postcourse student evaluations of medical teachers demonstrated high reliability between the two (Irby et al 1977). If the results of that single study in one medical school are generalizable, that would discount the durability argument.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratings obtained in such conditions have been found moderately (Overall & Marsh, 1979) to highly reproducible (Costin et al, 1971). In the medical context evidence for an excellent short-term stability has also been reported (Irby et al, 1977) but, at the experience of other investigators, medical students are only moderately consistent in the extent to which they evaluate teachers (West, 1988). Some data are also available on long-term stability, which refers to the consistency of ratings over extended periods of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%