The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review

Abstract

Objective This article reviews recent literature on the use of SNOMED CT as an extension of Lee et al’s 2014 review on the same topic. The Lee et al’s article covered literature published from 2001-2012, and the scope of this review was 2013-2020. Materials and Methods In line with Lee et al’s methods, we searched the PubMed and Embase databases and identified 1002 articles for review, including studies from January 2013 to September 2020. The retrieved articles were categorized and analyzed according to SNOMED CT focus categories (ie, indeterminate, theoretical, pre-development, implementation, and evaluation/commodity), usage categories (eg, illustrate terminology systems theory, prospective content coverage, used to classify or code in a study, retrieve or analyze patient data, etc.), medical domains, and countries. Results After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 622 articles were selected for final review. Compared to the papers published between 2001 and 2012, papers published between 2013 and 2020 revealed an increase in more mature usage of SNOMED CT, and the number of papers classified in the “implementation” and “evaluation/commodity” focus categories expanded. When analyzed by decade, papers in the “pre-development,” “implementation,” and “evaluation/commodity” categories were much more numerous in 2011-2020 than in 2001-2010, increasing from 169 to 293, 30 to 138, and 3 to 65, respectively. Conclusion Published papers in more mature usage categories have substantially increased since 2012. From 2013 to present, SNOMED CT has been increasingly implemented in more practical settings. Future research should concentrate on addressing whether SNOMED CT influences improvement in patient care.

Digital ethnicity data in population-wide electronic health records in England: a description of completeness, coverage, and granularity of diversity

“…Ethnicity is recorded using the following medical concepts (Figure 1): SNOMED concepts: Standardised vocabulary for digital recording patients' clinical information across NHS practices and healthcare providers, including ethnicity coding. 17 We focused on GDPPR records containing Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) 18 UK Edition ethnicity concepts. Any mention of SNOMED concepts in this paper directly refers to these codes.…”

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT): the impact of service changes due to COVID-19 on people with learning disabilities

“…For example, if IAPT data were linked to primary care SNOMED data (SNOMED is an abbreviation for Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine -Clinical Terms and is a structured clinical taxonomy for use in electronic health records, which is used in most General Practice services in the UK; cf. Chang and Mostafa, 2021) identifying people with formally diagnosed learning disabilities it would demonstrate very clear outcomes for people with learning disabilities and would offer the opportunity to validate the disability code used in this paper. However, this would require careful consideration given the preceding discussion of whether the disability code used here captures other people who might technically have a learning disability but who have not yet been in contact with services that have required a formal diagnosis for their receipt.…”

Representativeness, Vaccination Uptake, and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes 2020-2021 in the UK Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Network: Cohort Profile Summary

“…Our ontological mapping process recognizes that clinical concepts can be represented differently within a clinical terminology. To enable consistent and machine-readable identification of key outcomes and other variables [ 18 ], we use Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) as the principal terminology to develop code sets [ 19 ]. A curated code set is a list of relevant clinical codes that best represent a specific clinical idea.…”