2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of non‐GAAP measures in initial public offerings

Abstract: This study examines the use of non-GAAP measures (NGMs) in initial public offerings (IPOs). Based on NGMs collected for a sample of 300 IPO firms from 2009 to 2013, we find that 60% of IPO firms disclose NGMs in their registration filings. While a variety of NGMs are used, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and adjusted EBITDA are the most frequently reported NGMs. The vast majority of the reported NGMs are greater than the firms' GAAP earnings. The results also show that IP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EBITDA representing the operating cash profit after excluding cash operating expenses overcomes the plausibility of results distortion due to varied asset structures, debt-equity mix and tax rates across the firms and periods. The measure has been used in past studies (Liu and Zhang, 2020; Zheng and Stangeland, 2007). The study examines the earnings power of post-listing years 1 and 2; the averaging is avoided due to expected inconsistency in the post-listing years' performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBITDA representing the operating cash profit after excluding cash operating expenses overcomes the plausibility of results distortion due to varied asset structures, debt-equity mix and tax rates across the firms and periods. The measure has been used in past studies (Liu and Zhang, 2020; Zheng and Stangeland, 2007). The study examines the earnings power of post-listing years 1 and 2; the averaging is avoided due to expected inconsistency in the post-listing years' performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%