The Use of Science in Wildland Fire Management: a Review of Barriers and Facilitators

Abstract

Purpose of Review Science plays a critical role in natural resource management, and the use of science in decision-making is mandated by several policy initiatives. Other disciplines have documented the challenges associated with applying science to management and possible solutions to overcoming challenges, but the evaluation of science use in wildland fire management is relatively immature. In this paper, we reviewed the available literature that evaluates science use in wildland fire management and common barriers and facilitators to science use in decision-making. Recent Findings We developed a conceptual model that describes the possible uses of science in fire management (perception, planning, forecasting, implementation, assessment, communication, and policy), common barriers to science use (lack of science, uncertainty, funding/capacity, conflict), common facilitators to fire science use (collaboration, trust, boundary organizations, co-production), and factors that can act as facilitators or barriers to science use depending on their presence or absence (awareness, accessibility, relevance). In the context of our conceptual model, we reviewed 67 papers that examined fire science use between 1986 and 2019. Summary Most studies were conducted in the USA in the last 10 years and demonstrated that science is commonly used in fire management and that the maturation of organizations devoted to science translation and communication in the last 10 years has likely facilitated the application of fire science. The evaluation of fire science use, however, is still relatively immature, with studies needed on the use of fire science in countries outside the USA, the use of science in the management of wildfires, and in the crafting of policy related to wildland fire management.

A Historical Perspective to Inform Strategic Planning for 2020 End-of-Year Wildland Fire Response Efforts

“…Similarly, aircraft availability varies across and between years; given the complexities of the contracting systems in a multiagency environment, fleet availability may be unclear. A recent publication developed a list of barriers to the use of science in wildland fire management [49]. While the publication documents several critical barriers reflected in the current literature, missing from that list was the challenge in applying science because of the lack of expert analysts; currently, without such analysts, it is very challenging to build data-driven decision support products to support wildland fire managers in real-time.…”

Strategic Wildfire Response Decision Support and the Risk Management Assistance Program

“…In other words, there is a need to enhance both the informational content on which decisions are based and the process by which those decisions are reached [35,36] In response to the increasing complexity and risk of wildfire, there is an emerging body of literature focused on improving fire management decision processes. This entails, for example, the study of factors influencing fire manager decision-making, the study of factors influencing the adoption of fire science and decision support, a review and synthesis of decision support trends and needs, and the design and delivery of next-generation decision support (e.g., [14,25,31,34,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]). In the US, existing large fire decision support systems provide a range of services, such as spatial analysis, fire behavior modeling, hazard and risk assessment, and decision documentation [45,46].…”

A case-study of wildland fire management knowledge exchange: the barriers and facilitators in the development and integration of the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in Ontario, Canada

“…An important task of KE is identifying and understanding the significance of BF (Ryan and Cerveny 2011;Davis et al 2013;McGee et al 2016;Hunter et al 2020;Tedim et al 2021). Other disciplines have explored these BFs, such as conservation (e.g.…”