The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring

Bayen, Ute J.; Nakamura, Glenn V.; Dupuis, Susan; Yang, Chia-Hsiang

doi:10.3758/bf03198562

Cited by 130 publications

(224 citation statements)

References 63 publications

(59 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

197

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This explanation converges with the results in Bayen, Nakamura, Dupuis, and Yang (2000), in which it was found that failure to remember the source of information led to an attribution based on an expectation of the correct source. Because the participants were instructed that they would be tested on their memory for the event witnessed, in all likelihood, the event witnessed was considered an expected source.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

Habitual acceptance of misinformation: Examination of individual differences and source attributions

Cann

Katz

2005

Memory & Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study identifies individuals who are habitually susceptible to accepting postevent misinformation across testing on three separate events. The results indicate that those individuals identified as habitually susceptible exhibited higher dissociation scores and less of an association between memory accuracy and confidence than did the individuals identified as nonhabitually susceptible. When they were asked to identify the source of the remembered information, similar patterns of source attributions were found for all individuals when they were responding correctly and incorrectly to nonmisinformation and when they were correctly rejecting items of misinformation. Importantly, from a source-monitoring perspective, individuals identified as habitually susceptible demonstrated a different pattern of source attributions than did those classified as nonhabitually susceptible when they were accepting misinformation. Habitually susceptible individuals were as likely to attribute the source of their memory incorrectly to something seen in the experienced event as to attribute it correctly to something read after the fact.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

Habitual acceptance of misinformation: Examination of individual differences and source attributions

Cann

Katz

2005

Memory & Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous research has tended to imply that the use of schematic information in source monitoring reflects a guessing bias (e.g., Bayen, Nakamura, Dupuis, & Yang, 2000;Spaniol & Bayen, 2002). In those studies, information arising from a low-probability source was later attributed to a high-probability source.…”

Section: Constraints On Migration Of Objects Between Episodesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Migration of objects and inferences across episodes

Hannigan

Reinitz

2003

Memory & Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participants viewed episodes in the form of a series of photographs portraying ordinary routines (e.g., eating at a restaurant) and later received a recognition test. In Experiment 1, it was shown that objects (e.g., a vase of flowers, a pewter lantern) that appeared in a single episode during the study phase migrated between memories of episodes described by the same abstract schema (e.g., from Restaurant Episode A at study to Restaurant Episode B at test), and not between episodes anchored by different schemas. In Experiment 2, it was demonstrated that backward causal inferences from one study episode influenced memories of other episodes described by the same schema, and that highschema-relevant items viewed in one episode were sometimes remembered as having occurred in another episode of the same schematic type.

show abstract

“…Fortunately, alternative measurement tools exist in terms of multinomial models of source memory (Batchelder & Riefer, 1990;Bayen, Murnane, & Erdfelder, 1996), which allow us to decompose raw source classification data into old-new discrimination, source memory, and various forms of guessing biases. We used the multinomial source-monitoring model developed and successfully validated by Bayen et al (1996), which has been successfully applied in a number of experiments (e.g., Bayen, Nakamura, Dupuis, & Yang, 2000;Bell, Buchner, & Mund, 2008;D'Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2004;Doerksen & Shimamura, 2001;Spaniol & Bayen, 2002). An adaptation of the model for the present purposes is presented in Figure 2.…”

Section: Measuring Source Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%