1990
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4807357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of rubber dam in the UK. A survey

Abstract: The purpose of this survey was to determine the frequency of use of rubber dam isolation in the United Kingdom for both operative and endodontic procedures. Questionnaires were sent to 1800 dentists throughout the country, with 1008 returns (56%). Most replies were from dentists active in general dental practice. The use of rubber dam is largely neglected and more than 70% of all dentists surveyed did not utilise rubber dam for any procedure whatsoever.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
71
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier survey findings suggest that use of rubber dam is associated with certain dental specialization, age and procedure characteristics [16][17][18], correlation also observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Earlier survey findings suggest that use of rubber dam is associated with certain dental specialization, age and procedure characteristics [16][17][18], correlation also observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Previous studies have reported under-usage of RD, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] a similar finding to this study. RD has been available since 1864 and is considered an ideal device for tooth isolation in restorative dentistry.…”
Section: Jofrsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The chances of swallowing or aspiration of residual amalgam, resin, wedges, pins and burs during operative treatment and endodontic files during endodontic treatment can be reduced by the use of rubber dam, therefore the use of rubber dam is considered to be a standard of care in this and many other countries. 19,25 The results of present study, by combining the responses in rank 1 and 2 in (Table1), "never and seldom", showed that almost 50% of the respondents do not use the rubber dam during endodontic treatment. Because they considered that the success rate of root canal fillings placed without rubber dam and with rubber dam was the same.…”
Section: IVmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results of present study are very much similar to the results of other international studies. 2,14,19 The present study showed that, the use of rubber dam in both operative and endodontic procedures was quite low despite the known advantages of rubber dam. The majority of the respondents ie 96.5% in the present study, were placing direct anterior composite restorations, 94.5% placed direct posterior composite restorations, 89% of the respondents in the present study reported that they placed amalgam restorations and 76% of the respondents reported that they were doing endodontic treatment.…”
Section: IVmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation