2016
DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of reformatted Cone Beam CT images in assessing mid-face trauma, with a focus on the orbital floor fractures

Abstract: Background and aimThis study aims at evaluating the reliability on specific multi-planar cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) reconstruction in the orbital floor fractures.MethodsCBCT examination of the mid-face fractures area involving the floor of the orbit was performed in a number of 93 trauma patients by two independent radiologists. Both radiologists assessed the axial, coronal and sagittal sections and also the oblique coronal and sagittal extracted sections evaluating the location of the orbital fractu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is quite popular in many dental clinics and some hospitals nowadays. They are more cost-effective, have a very good diagnostic value, and allow reconstruction of oblique images extracted from the 3D data, which is useful when assessing pure orbital floor fractures 28 . However, the main disadvantage of CBCT for midfacial fractures is that the patient needs to stand upright, which might be a problem for patients with severe head injuries, with cervical fractures or unconscious/sedated, and therefore they are not used routinely in most hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is quite popular in many dental clinics and some hospitals nowadays. They are more cost-effective, have a very good diagnostic value, and allow reconstruction of oblique images extracted from the 3D data, which is useful when assessing pure orbital floor fractures 28 . However, the main disadvantage of CBCT for midfacial fractures is that the patient needs to stand upright, which might be a problem for patients with severe head injuries, with cervical fractures or unconscious/sedated, and therefore they are not used routinely in most hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular spiral CT technology (CT) and cone beam tomography (CBCT) must be mentioned in the context of midfacial trauma. Modern CBCT is often superior to CT scan with regard to diagnostics for hard tissue because metallic artifacts are less negatively overlying compared to CT diagnostics [14,15]. If soft tissue has to be evaluated like for example with regard to intraorbital bleeding, contrast-enhanced CT scan must certainly be preferred [16,17].…”
Section: Posttraumatic Reconstruction Of the Midfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderne DVT ist z.T. dem CT im Hinblick auf die Diagnostik für das Hartgewebe überlegen, da metallische Artefakte weniger negativ überlagernd sind als in der CT-Diagnostik [14,15]. Sind Fragen des Weichgewebes adressiert, wie z.…”
Section: Posttraumatische Rekonstruktion Des Mittelgesichtesunclassified
“…Head CT scan in axial and coronal sections is compulsory, but frequently sagittal section reconstructions offer useful data about the anterior segment of the skull base and orbital floor. 3D reconstructions are useful for surgical planning and even explaining the patient the complexity of the trauma and improve informed consent (Figure 1) [9].…”
Section: Principles Of Diagnosis In Craniofacial Trauma In Cases Withmentioning
confidence: 99%