1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.1989.tb01545.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Redox Potential to Control Ferric Sulphate Dosing during Phosphate Removal

Abstract: In recent years, the Norfolk Broads have been enriched with sewage effluent and runoff from heavily fertilized land. Nitrogen and phosphorus compounds from these sources can cause ecological problems by stimulating increase in algal biomass in the water, so part of Anglian Water's programme of research in Broadland has been to remove phosphate from major sewage effluents discharged to the Rivers Ant and Bure. This is achieved by dosing ferric sulphate to secondary effluent and settling the resultant insoluble … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precipitation with lime (producing calcium hydroxyapatite) has also been used; this produces larger sludge volumes because of the simultaneous production of calcium carbonate, but the sludge has better thickening and stabilisation properties. Removal of total phosphorus in excess of 90% is achieved (Mekerson, 1973;Kerrison et al, 1989), and treatment may have additional benefits such as the more efficient precipitation of suspended organic solids. Costs are approximately 10-30% in addition to the costs of treatment to the secondary stage.…”
Section: Phosphorus Removal Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation with lime (producing calcium hydroxyapatite) has also been used; this produces larger sludge volumes because of the simultaneous production of calcium carbonate, but the sludge has better thickening and stabilisation properties. Removal of total phosphorus in excess of 90% is achieved (Mekerson, 1973;Kerrison et al, 1989), and treatment may have additional benefits such as the more efficient precipitation of suspended organic solids. Costs are approximately 10-30% in addition to the costs of treatment to the secondary stage.…”
Section: Phosphorus Removal Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%