2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of real time ultrasound scanning as a teaching method of anatomy in an undergraduate sonography and medical imaging degree in an Australian university

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis was conducted in relation to the specific study objectives: student perceptions of each delivery method, and preferred delivery methods in relation to each of the nine learning aims. First, to compare the overall effectiveness of each of the eight delivery methods we summarized the data as did by bowman's et al2–5 leading to generated reduced matrix of eight columns (the methods) by 92 rows (the students). These are related data because each student gave a score to every delivery method and therefore comparisons among delivery methods should be made with a non-parametric (Friedman) or parametric (repeated measures ANOVA) test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis was conducted in relation to the specific study objectives: student perceptions of each delivery method, and preferred delivery methods in relation to each of the nine learning aims. First, to compare the overall effectiveness of each of the eight delivery methods we summarized the data as did by bowman's et al2–5 leading to generated reduced matrix of eight columns (the methods) by 92 rows (the students). These are related data because each student gave a score to every delivery method and therefore comparisons among delivery methods should be made with a non-parametric (Friedman) or parametric (repeated measures ANOVA) test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are related data because each student gave a score to every delivery method and therefore comparisons among delivery methods should be made with a non-parametric (Friedman) or parametric (repeated measures ANOVA) test. The data are ordinal scale and did not show significant heteroscedasticitywhich was determined using ANOVA Post hoc test, so repeated measures ANOVA were used with students as subjects and the delivery method as the repeated measure as done by Bowman's et al2–5. A priori comparisons (Duncan's multiple Range test, MRT) were used to compare mean satisfaction with ultrasound and the other seven delivery methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, from their methods (where students were told to give low scores to indicate excellent matches between deliv-ery methods and learning aims, and high scores to indicate poor matchesbetween delivery methods and learning aims), a low mean should indicate a good match and a high mean a poor match. However, Umar et al 1 have interpreted the means in Table 1 to indicate the opposite: "3D radiological imaging being the most preferred method overall (48.17), and ultrasound the least (32.48)".The African Health Sciences Vol 20 Issue 1, March, 2020 Table 1: the design of the questionnaire used by Umar et al 1 , based on similar questionnaires used by others [2][3][4] . Each student gave their perceptions of the effectiveness of every method for delivering information in relation to each of the nine learning aims by placing a number from 1 -8 in every square of the matrix.…”
Section: African Health Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%