2023
DOI: 10.5588/pha.22.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of rats to detect drug-resistant TB

Abstract: Although detection of drug-susceptible TB by Anti-Persoonsmijnen Ontmijnende Product Ontwikkeling-trained African giant pouched rats has been known for more than a decade, the detection of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) using rats has never been explored before. We present what we believe to be the first report on rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) detected using Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra, comparably identified by rats sniffing sputum samples from presumptive TB patients: 88% of RR-TB detected using Ultra were identified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in cancer detection studies, the dogs were permitted to explore the wheel without the handler being present allowing for double-blind studies. The current study employed a 1-in-5 bioassay that replicated methods used by the Belgian Police in human scent line-ups [30] such that the same panel could be replicated multiple times with the samples in different positions [31]. In addition, more than three times the number of samples (n = 518; 120 CWD positive and 405 non-infected samples) were presented in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in cancer detection studies, the dogs were permitted to explore the wheel without the handler being present allowing for double-blind studies. The current study employed a 1-in-5 bioassay that replicated methods used by the Belgian Police in human scent line-ups [30] such that the same panel could be replicated multiple times with the samples in different positions [31]. In addition, more than three times the number of samples (n = 518; 120 CWD positive and 405 non-infected samples) were presented in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%