1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00410551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of RAS and related models in manpower forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 See Stone and Brown (1964), Evans and Lindley (1973), Kadas and Klafzky (1976) and Van Eijs and Borghans (1996). 9 For more details see Evans and Lindley (1973) and Van Eijs and Borghans (1996).…”
Section: Allocation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 See Stone and Brown (1964), Evans and Lindley (1973), Kadas and Klafzky (1976) and Van Eijs and Borghans (1996). 9 For more details see Evans and Lindley (1973) and Van Eijs and Borghans (1996).…”
Section: Allocation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 For more details see Evans and Lindley (1973) and Van Eijs and Borghans (1996). 1 0 Tinbergen notices that since the …rst solution concentrates all observations whereas the second solution spreads them evenly over the matrix, the actual allocation matrix may be somewhere in between.…”
Section: Allocation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAS is a method which constructs a matrix given the row and column sums, so that the conditions imposed by these sums is satisfied and the distance to another matrix is minimised (Evans & Lindley, 1973;Borghans & Heijke, 1996) [13]. Results.…”
Section: Higher Level Of Educational Attainment: Educational Inflatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tilanus (1966) treated a comparable problem and derived the statistical correction method (SCM) for input–output predictions based on the observed structure of the predictions errors and supplementary statistical hypotheses, which gave almost the same results as RAS. Johansen, Alstadheim, and Langsether (1968) and Evans and Lindley (1973) argue in more general terms that individual elements contain more information than the row and column sums, and should therefore be taken into account for updating: where z i j are the interindustry transactions elements to be projected, z o i j are elements of an already known IO matrix, e i j is a stochastic term representing unexplained deviations, and r and s are chosen to minimize .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method will present an alternative to that of Johansen et al (1968) and Evans and Lindley (1973), in cases where data are available for a series of years, and thus takes the historical behavior of the cells of the matrix that has to be updated into account, while it is easy to implement. The method is based on the following assumptions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%