2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-012-1812-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of bone and joint infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Only a few studies have investigated the use of PCT in the diagnosis of bone and joint infection, and these studies have had relatively small sample sizes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of serum procalcitonin (PCT) in the identification of osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in patients who present with fever and orthopedic symptoms. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases and the reference lists of relevant articles were searched, with no language restrictions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
40
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
40
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Soon later, several studies suggested that serum PCT could be used as a sensitive biomarker to detect or rule out BSIs in patients with suspected bacterial infections and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). 7,8 Despite many studies and even some meta-analyses, the topic is still a matter of heated debate due to inconsistent findings. [9][10][11][12][13][14] Such heterogeneity might arise from using different subgroups of patients, 9 inconsistency in defining bacteremia and septicemia [10][11][12] and severe methodological flaws (such as using a small sample size and problematic grouping).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon later, several studies suggested that serum PCT could be used as a sensitive biomarker to detect or rule out BSIs in patients with suspected bacterial infections and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). 7,8 Despite many studies and even some meta-analyses, the topic is still a matter of heated debate due to inconsistent findings. [9][10][11][12][13][14] Such heterogeneity might arise from using different subgroups of patients, 9 inconsistency in defining bacteremia and septicemia [10][11][12] and severe methodological flaws (such as using a small sample size and problematic grouping).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that PCT levels are higher in patients with osteomyelitis then those with soft tissue or septic arthritis [ 79 ]. An elevated PCT at 0.4 ng/mL was 85.2 % sensitive and 87.3 % specifi c in diagnosing septic arthritis and acute osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Procalcitoninmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Few studies have already established the role of procalcitonin as a prognostic and diagnostic marker in bacterial indications and as a tool to start antibiotic administration. 5 The aim of the present study was to study the role of PCT in conditions of septic arthritis and Osteomyelitis with comparison to other markers like CRP. We also intend to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of PCT in cases of Septic arthritis and Osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%