1968
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE USE OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT IN CONDITIONING ATTENDING BEHAVIOR1

Abstract: Individual conditioning techniques were applied in a controlled setting to increase attending behavior of an underachieving 9-yr-old male subject. The procedure involved: (1) determining a stable response pattern, (2) introducing a treatment variable to establish a high rate of task-attending behavior, (3) measuring the effect of withdrawal of the treatment variable after attaining criterion performance, and (4) transferring control to the classroom. The interval of attending behavior required for reinforcemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aversive stimulation (Hall, Axelrod, Foundopoulos, Shellman, Campbell, and Cranston, 1971;Risley, 1968), response cost (Wolf, King, Lachowicz, and Giles, 1970), timeout (Carlson, Arnold, Becker, and Madsen, 1968; Kubany, Weiss, and Sloggett, 1971;Wahler, 1969), group contingencies (Barrish, Saunders, and Wolf, 1969;Harris and Sherman, 1973), and contingency management approaches (Hall, Lund, and Jackson, 1968;O'Leary and Drabman, 1971;Walker and Buckley, 1968) are among the procedures that have been shown to improve the behavior of "hyperactive" and disruptive children. However, these effects have been limited in two areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aversive stimulation (Hall, Axelrod, Foundopoulos, Shellman, Campbell, and Cranston, 1971;Risley, 1968), response cost (Wolf, King, Lachowicz, and Giles, 1970), timeout (Carlson, Arnold, Becker, and Madsen, 1968; Kubany, Weiss, and Sloggett, 1971;Wahler, 1969), group contingencies (Barrish, Saunders, and Wolf, 1969;Harris and Sherman, 1973), and contingency management approaches (Hall, Lund, and Jackson, 1968;O'Leary and Drabman, 1971;Walker and Buckley, 1968) are among the procedures that have been shown to improve the behavior of "hyperactive" and disruptive children. However, these effects have been limited in two areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of research data on this question is limited. However, the available evidence indicates that effective generalization and maintenance of modified behavior does not naturally occur when treatment procedures are abruptly withdrawn (Walker, Mattson, and Buckley, 1971;Walker and Buckley, 1968;Birnbrauer, Wolf, Kidder, and Tague, 1965;Kuypers, Becker, and O'Leary, 1968;Patterson, Shaw and Ebner, unpub-' (Walker, Mattson, and Buckley, 1971; Walker, Fiegenbaum, and Hops, 1971) the probability is substantially reduced that the modified behavior will be maintained automatically or naturally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important that generalization be assessed so that program modifications can be made as needed. Research has indicated that stimulus generalization is more likely to occur if the new situation or setting is similar to the one in which the desired behavior was first learned (Kennedy & Thompson, 1967;Patterson, 1965;Walker & Buckley, 1968). Therefore, if generalization has not occurred, you need only restructure the situation to reinforce the new behavior in the present situation.…”
Section: Focus On Exceptional Children April 1977mentioning
confidence: 99%