2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of point load test for Dubai weak calcareous sandstones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have proposed a number of the correlations based on the tests they performed on different rock types. Some of them are Broch & Franklin (1972); Bieniawski (1975); Akram & Bakar (2007); Kim, Kim, Kang, Kang, & Baek (2012); Salah, Omar, & Shanableh (2014); Elhakim (2015). However, estimation of the UCS using these correlations for different rock types could lead to large variability and errors.…”
Section: Figure 1 Some Rock Samples After Point Load Index Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers have proposed a number of the correlations based on the tests they performed on different rock types. Some of them are Broch & Franklin (1972); Bieniawski (1975); Akram & Bakar (2007); Kim, Kim, Kang, Kang, & Baek (2012); Salah, Omar, & Shanableh (2014); Elhakim (2015). However, estimation of the UCS using these correlations for different rock types could lead to large variability and errors.…”
Section: Figure 1 Some Rock Samples After Point Load Index Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, estimation of the UCS using these correlations for different rock types could lead to large variability and errors. Therefore, it is highly recommended to develop UCS -I s(50) correlations to be used for any specific rock type and local geologies (Elhakim, 2015).…”
Section: Figure 1 Some Rock Samples After Point Load Index Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, strength and deformation is controlled by inherent physical properties of the material such as mineral composition, density, structure, fabric and porosity. Therefor a 1 m selection buffer was enforced on laboratory results against petrographic (Abbs 1985;Elhakim 2015) analysis sample depths; where this criterion could not be satisfied the nearest laboratory results were selected and assumed as being representative. Laboratory results that satisfied these criteria are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess if the selected laboratory results were representative of the Ghayathi Formation sandstone: the UCS and correlated PLI were compared against all the laboratory results for the eight boreholes. Figure 2 shows this comparison: triangles represent selected representative petrographic lab results against UCS results, which are represented by hatches and correlated point load index using a determined correlation factor of UCS = 4.5829 Â I 50 , which is in general agreement with Abbs (1985) and Elhakim (2015), are represented by circles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure load, rock size, rock shape, and loading mode are used to calculate the point load strength index (PLSI or Is (50) ) [3,4]. e PLSI is an important strength parameter index for the classification of rock strength [4][5][6][7], determination of UCS [1][2][3][4][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and estimation of strength anisotropy [4,11,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%