The use of physical restraints and PRN medications in adolescent psychiatric inpatient units

Abstract

Problem Although physical restraint practices and psychotropic/sedative pro re neta (PRN, as needed) medications have been commonly used for managing inpatient aggression, little is known about the characteristics of adolescents who receive them in psychiatric adolescent inpatient units. We aimed to determine the relationship between the use of physical restraints and psychotropic/sedative PRN medications, and to characterize individual attributes, substance use, clinical factors, and time of the first restraint episodes of the use of physical restraints and psychotropic/sedative PRN medications. Methods A retrospective case‐control study approach was used with the data from electronic health records at a pediatric psychiatric hospital in the United States. Descriptive statistics, χ2, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazard model were used. Findings Participants of younger age and participants with a longer length of stay were significantly associated with the use of physical restraints and psychotropic/sedative PRN medications, although the substance‐related risks were not significantly associated with the use of restraints. Physical restraints were more likely to have occurred soon after the admission and tapered off as the length of stay increased. Conclusions This study provides important information in understanding the risk factors of the use of restraints and psychotropic/sedative PRN medications in psychiatric adolescent inpatient units.

Nurses should respond to critical quality questions of child/adolescent inpatient treatment

“…All focus on important issues that inpatient nurses deal with such as the broad aim to reduce, if not eliminate, coercive measures. Via analysis of site records, Chung et al (2023) conducted a study on the use of restraints and pro re nata (PRN) medications at one pediatric inpatient unit. They found a significant restraint rate (18%) which they note is within the range reported in the literature.…”