2023
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000004468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Physical Characteristics to Explain Variation in Ball-Carrying Capability in Elite Rugby Union: A Narrative Review

Abstract: Hart, AS, Erskine, RM, and Clark, DR. The use of physical characteristics to explain variation in ball-carrying capability in elite rugby union: a narrative review. J Strength Cond Res 37(8): 1718–1727, 2023—The effectiveness of offensive ball carrying has been identified as a key determinant in elite rugby union try-scoring success and subsequent match outcome. Despite this, there is limited research evaluating the physical qualities believed to underpin the ball-carrying capability among elite rugby union pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research focuses on the fact that aerobic demands may differ depending on playing position. Similar findings have made by a team of specialists that considered the physiology of aerobic exercise of professional rugby players, where it has been found that attackers and defenders have different levels of aerobic fitness (Hu et al, 2022;Hart et al, 2023), highlighting the need for individualized training programs (Zabaloy et al, 2020;Scott et al, 2023;Taylor et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our research focuses on the fact that aerobic demands may differ depending on playing position. Similar findings have made by a team of specialists that considered the physiology of aerobic exercise of professional rugby players, where it has been found that attackers and defenders have different levels of aerobic fitness (Hu et al, 2022;Hart et al, 2023), highlighting the need for individualized training programs (Zabaloy et al, 2020;Scott et al, 2023;Taylor et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%