2004
DOI: 10.1038/ng1433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of pedigree, sib-pair and association studies of common diseases for genetic mapping and epidemiology

Abstract: Efforts to identify gene variants associated with susceptibility to common diseases use three approaches: pedigree and affected sib-pair linkage studies and association studies of population samples. The different aims of these study designs reflect their derivation from biological versus epidemiological traditions. Similar principles regarding determination of the evidence levels required to consider the results statistically significant apply to both linkage and association studies, however. Such determinati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
4
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of false discoveries is considerable in candidate gene studies (47)(48)(49). To better assess this risk, we estimated the q-value for each marker genotyped in stage 2, which can be interpreted as the probability that a marker identified as significant is a false discovery (50)(51)(52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of false discoveries is considerable in candidate gene studies (47)(48)(49). To better assess this risk, we estimated the q-value for each marker genotyped in stage 2, which can be interpreted as the probability that a marker identified as significant is a false discovery (50)(51)(52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these challenges, it is hard to determine which RVs are risk factors, which modulate risk, and which are unrelated to phenotype. The rarity of these events may preclude using traditional statistical techniques given that these techniques require a much larger sample to prove statistical association with disease [65]. Some reasonable statistical solutions are being developed [25].…”
Section: The Current State Of Autism Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because strict Bonferroni correction is considered overly conservative, a Bayesian formula was applied to obtain X0.95 posterior probability of a correct inference of association to a particular gene; this approach was advocated by Freimer and Sabatti, 13 and modified to take into account recent estimates of Pseudoautosomal locus in schizophrenia T Lencz et al the total number of genes in the human genome to approximately 20 000, resulting in a P-value threshold of B4.2 Â 10…”
Section: Whole-genome Association Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%