2013
DOI: 10.1177/0269215513490178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: a systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility

Abstract: A total of 11 instruments were identified, and although some had strong points, there is no single good instrument that can be recommended specifically. Applying a combination of the strengths of the available instruments within a goal-setting framework can improve goal setting and tailor it to individual patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
156
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(129 reference statements)
1
156
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Involving clients in the goalsetting process is seen as an essential component in clientcentred practice with calls for occupational therapists to develop and utilise strategies to aid this process (Maitra and Erway, 2006;Stevens et al, 2013). There are a number of tools to support goal-setting and facilitate a client-centred approach, such as Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) (Kiresuk et al, 1994) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (Law et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involving clients in the goalsetting process is seen as an essential component in clientcentred practice with calls for occupational therapists to develop and utilise strategies to aid this process (Maitra and Erway, 2006;Stevens et al, 2013). There are a number of tools to support goal-setting and facilitate a client-centred approach, such as Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) (Kiresuk et al, 1994) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (Law et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutual goal setting is an effective nursing intervention in patients with chronic diseases [8,9], and involves patients and nurses collaborating to set patient goals and reaching a mutual agreement about these goals as treatment intervention [10]. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is one way of putting this intervention into practical use [11].…”
Section: Mutual Goal Setting and Goal Attainment Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods are clearly described and (in different ways) offer a standard approach to identifying patient-centred goals and measuring goal-related progress. However, they do not guide health professionals through all stages of the goal-setting process [31]. The G-AP framework includes, (i) a patient-centred planning stage (which details goal-related activities that will optimise patients' behaviour as they pursue their personal goals) and (ii) an appraisal, feedback and decision-making stage (which informs practice following goal-related successes, setbacks and failures) [10][11][12].…”
Section: Variable and Potentially Sub-optimal Practicementioning
confidence: 99%