2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of noninvasive imaging techniques in the diagnosis of melanoma: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Though some automated tools may assist with diagnosis, many have poor specificity and there is insufficient evidence for their safety and efficacy in clinical practice at this stage. [26][27][28][29][30] Therefore, the Australian melanoma guidelines do not recommend routine use of automated diagnostic tools. 14 It is anticipated that, as these tools improve, particularly with integration of artificial intelligence, the evidence for their use will strengthen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though some automated tools may assist with diagnosis, many have poor specificity and there is insufficient evidence for their safety and efficacy in clinical practice at this stage. [26][27][28][29][30] Therefore, the Australian melanoma guidelines do not recommend routine use of automated diagnostic tools. 14 It is anticipated that, as these tools improve, particularly with integration of artificial intelligence, the evidence for their use will strengthen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study concluded that these tools would aid in better diagnosis but will not replace clinical decision making. 133 Deep learning algorithms achieved better diagnostic performance than pathologists in identifying malignant tumours and detecting lymph node metastases in tissue sections of women with breast cancer. 4,39 In the field of radiology too, artificial intelligence systems have been on par with, and sometimes outperformed radiologists.…”
Section: Human Versus Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tyrime dalyvavo 184 pacientai, nustatytos 59 histopatologinės melanomos diagnozės bei 150 gerybinių odos darinių. Juos analizuojant, didžiausias jautrumas ir specifiškumas buvo pasiektas naudojant neinvazinių vaizdinių tyrimų technologijas, rekomenduojant jomis papildyti diagnostikos galimybes, o ne pakeisti gydytoją [16]. Tyrime, kuris vertino 300 vaizdų klasifikavimą į piktybinius arba gerybinius darinius, buvo nustatyta, jog patys geriausi rezultatai pasiekiami diagnozuojant ne gydytojui ar algoritmui, o derinant jų siūlomas diagnozes [17].…”
Section: Odos Vėžio Diagnostika Ir Dirbtinis Intelektasunclassified