1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of non-ionic water-soluble contrast agents for small bowel follow-through examination

Abstract: In certain situations it is preferable to perform small bowel examination using water-soluble contrast agents. Generally, ionic agents are used, but non-ionic agents may be an alternative in certain circumstances. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of small bowel examinations using non-ionic media in order to determine their efficacy. A total of 52 water-soluble non-ionic small bowel follow-through examinations were performed in 42 patients using 100 ml iohexol. Indications for the study and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis is almost as accurate as with barium studies but there is less definition, especially with more distal lesions. 19 Water-soluble contrast examinations through the rectum or in retrograde fashion from stomas can also be highly contributory.…”
Section: Barium Follow-through Versus Water-soluble Contrast Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis is almost as accurate as with barium studies but there is less definition, especially with more distal lesions. 19 Water-soluble contrast examinations through the rectum or in retrograde fashion from stomas can also be highly contributory.…”
Section: Barium Follow-through Versus Water-soluble Contrast Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-ionic water-soluble contrast, such as iopromide, is safer on aspiration compared to barium and gastrograffin. 4,5 However, they will require larger volumes to define the oesophageal anatomy. The surgeon should weigh the risks and benefits of a barium contrast in a patient with risk of aspiration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%