The use of non-contact structured light scanning in burns pressure splint construction

Pilley, Matthew; Hitchens, C.; Rose, Gabriel; Alexander, Susan; Wimpenny, D. I.

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.005

Cited by 19 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The images or data are then processed and merged using dedicated image analysis software into a single 3D image. Additionally, other commonly used 3D imaging techniques include structured light scanner systems (or coherence scanning interferometery) such as the Artec [ 90 ] (Artec Group,USA/Luxemborg/Russia) and ATOS series of scanners [ 91 ], and laser scanning devices such as the Minolta Vivid 900 or 910 3D linear laser scanner (Konica-Minolta, Osaka, Japan) [ 92 , 93 ]. Whole body scanners such as the Cyberware Whole Body Color 3D Scanner (Model WBX, Cyberware Inc, Monterey, California) [ 94 ] are also available.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundProblematic scarring remains a challenging aspect to address in the treatment of burns and can significantly affect the quality of life of the burn survivor. At present, there are few treatments available in the clinic to control adverse scarring, but experimental pharmacological anti-scarring strategies are now beginning to emerge. Their comparative success must be based on objective measurements of scarring, yet currently the clinical assessment of scars is not carried out systematically and is mostly based on subjective review of patients. However, several techniques and devices are being introduced that allow objective analysis of the burn scar. The aim of this article is to evaluate various objective measurement tools currently available and recommend a useful panel that is suitable for use in clinical trials of anti-scarring therapies.MethodsA systematic literature search was done using the Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The identified devices were then classified and grouped according to the parameters they measured.The tools were then compared and assessed in terms of inter- and intra-rater reproducibility, ease of use and cost.ResultsAfter duplicates were removed, 5062 articles were obtained in the search. After further screening, 157 articles which utilised objective burn scar measurement systems or tools were obtained. The scar measurement devices can be broadly classified into those measuring colour, metric variables, texture, biomechanical properties and pathophysiological disturbances.ConclusionsObjective scar measurement tools allow the accurate and reproducible evaluation of scars, which is important for both clinical and scientific use. However, studies to evaluate their relative performance and merits of these tools are scarce, and there remain factors, such as itch and pain, which cannot be measured objectively. On reviewing the available evidence, a panel of devices for objective scar measurement is recommended consisting of the 3D cameras (Eykona/Lifeviz/Vectra H1) for surface area and volume, DSM II colorimeter for colour, Dermascan high-frequency ultrasound for scar thickness and Cutometer for skin elasticity and pliability.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accordingly, studies have shown therapy adherence can be a serious problem, displayed by a compliance for head and neck pressure garments of 44% in a study by Johnson et al 16,17 Although clinical evidence is lacking, recommendations about facial mask therapy for hypertrophic burn scars suggest a pressure mask should be worn 18 to 24 hours a day, with a targeted continuous pressure of at least 20 mm Hg for 6 to 18 months. [18][19][20] In this study, patients were asked to wear the mask for a minimum of 8 to 12 hours a day, preferably during the night. 21 Primarily, this was decided for preventing social, emotional, and physical difficulties as much as possible.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Satisfaction with Facial Appearance and Quality of Life after Treatment of Face Scars with a Transparent Facial Pressure Mask

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Treatment of facial hypertrophic scars and deformities has developed from the use of elastic fabric hoods to transparent facemasks. The clinical effects of these masks have been described. However, the psychological impact of wearing such a mask is not well documented. The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction with their current facial appearance, to assess the end result of facemask therapy, and to assess the decision to have undergone facemask therapy by means of four different FACE-Q questionnaires. Out of the eligible 87 patients who completed the facemask therapy between January 2012 and November 2017, 42 filled out the questionnaires. These patients wore a custom-fabricated facemask because of facial hypertrophic scars and severe postsurgical facial irregularities. Patients who wore the mask 12 to 16 hours per day were significantly more satisfied with the end result compared with those who wore it 4 to 8 hours daily. Also, patients who wore the mask 8 to 12 and 12 to 16 hours each day were more satisfied to have undergone therapy compared with those who wore it 4 to 8 hours daily. Furthermore, patients who finished therapy 3 to 4 years and 4 to 5 years ago reported a significant higher satisfaction with facial appearance compared with those who completed therapy in a time period shorter than 1 year ago. Patients who finished therapy 3 to 4 years ago reported higher satisfaction with their facial appearance compared with those who finished therapy 2 to 3 years ago. Additionally, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessments Score (POSAS) showed a significant reduction between start and end of therapy. This study shows facemask therapy to result in long-lasting stable results. It also shows a longer daily wearing of the facemask to result in the highest satisfaction according to patients.

show abstract

“…Typical applications include the production of patient-specific anatomical models, transient use guides to aid cutting/drilling and osteotomy procedures, production of long-term implants and extra-oral maxillofacial prostheses made specifically for a named patient (Bibb et al, 2010;Budak et al, 2018;Chandra et al, 2005;Eggbeer et al, 2012;Mankovich et al, 1990;Salmi et al, 2012). 3D technologies have also been applied to the development of facial burn/injury splints to compress hypertropic scar tissue and reduce its prominence over time (Pilley et al, 2011;Visscher et al, 2018). Reported benefits of patient-specific implants and devices include improved clinical outcomes and reduced procedure duration compared to traditional "artisanal" methods of producing custom implants .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying research and development priorities for an in-hospital 3D design engineering facility in India

Eggbeer

Mehrotra

Beverley

et al. 2020

Journal of Design, Business &Amp; Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advanced three-dimensional (3D) design and engineering technologies have revolutionized patient-specific implants, prostheses and medical devices, particularly in the cranio-maxillofacial and oral medical fields. Lately, decreasing costs, coupled with the reported benefits of bringing design and production technology closer to the point of healthcare delivery, have encouraged hospitals to implement their own 3D design and engineering services. Most academic literature reports on the factors that influence the sustainable development of such services in high-income countries. But what of low- and middle-income countries where demand for custom craniofacial devices is high? What are the unique challenges to implement in-hospital services in resource-constrained environments? This article reports the findings of a collaborative project, Co-MeDDI (Collaborative Medical Device Design Initiative), that brought together a UK-based team with the experience of setting up and running a hospital-based 3D service in the United Kingdom with the Maxillofacial Department of a public hospital in the Uttar Pradesh region of India, which had recently received funding to establish a similar capability. We describe a structured design research approach consisting of a series of exchange activities taking place during the lifetime of the project that compared different aspects of the healthcare innovation ecosystem for 3D services in India and the United Kingdom. Based on the findings of the different activities, we identify key factors that influence the adoption of such services in India. The findings are of relevance to healthcare policy-makers and public hospital managers in resource-constrained environments, and to academics and practitioners engaging in collaborative export of healthcare initiatives.

show abstract

The use of non-contact structured light scanning in burns pressure splint construction

Cited by 19 publications

References 9 publications

A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements

A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements

Satisfaction with Facial Appearance and Quality of Life after Treatment of Face Scars with a Transparent Facial Pressure Mask

Identifying research and development priorities for an in-hospital 3D design engineering facility in India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About