2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20174683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms to Control Low Rigidity Shafts Machining

Abstract: The article presents an original machine-learning-based automated approach for controlling the process of machining of low-rigidity shafts using artificial intelligence methods. Three models of hybrid controllers based on different types of neural networks and genetic algorithms were developed. In this study, an objective function optimized by a genetic algorithm was replaced with a neural network trained on real-life data. The task of the genetic algorithm is to select the optimal values of the input paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, a Convolutional Neural Network structure was implemented with ResNet configuration, considering the responsive fixtures and process data as input, in order to allow the Bidirectional LSTM model to predict the part deformation with an error equal to 10.61% [29]. LSTM was also applied to model the dependency between the deviation, tensile force and eccentricity of low-rigidity shaft machining with a MSE of 1.5456 × 10 −5 [90].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, a Convolutional Neural Network structure was implemented with ResNet configuration, considering the responsive fixtures and process data as input, in order to allow the Bidirectional LSTM model to predict the part deformation with an error equal to 10.61% [29]. LSTM was also applied to model the dependency between the deviation, tensile force and eccentricity of low-rigidity shaft machining with a MSE of 1.5456 × 10 −5 [90].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a large number of experimental tests is often infeasible, for example, because of the constraints of time and costs. One of the solutions can be the application of computer methods, such as the finite element method (FEM) [25][26][27][28][29][30], the boundary element method (BEM) [31][32][33][34], predictive modelling [35][36][37][38][39], and data analytics [40][41][42][43][44][45]. Mathematical modelling with a modest dataset acquired may help to determine the relationships between the individual parameters and mechanical properties, to identify the most promising direction of research, to reduce the number of physical tests, and to markedly reduce the time and costs of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordination of the guide pads, cutting edges and machining parameters can produce exclusive surface features [ 30 ], but there is need to monitor fracture-related damage of both the workpiece and machine tool, and to perform recondition of the tool suitability for further use [ 31 ]. A cutting tool wear may be of a mechanical, adhesive, chemical and thermal nature [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Geometric changes are caused by friction related to the loss of the edge material and the changing local properties by plastic deformations, high temperatures and the chemical effect of the interacting medium [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%