The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding negative pressure therapy, a number of studies have shown a decreased infection rate in open tibial fractures, the possibility of extending the time to definitive coverage, and a lower failure rate of definitive flaps (63,64). However, other studies have shown no clear evidence for the advantage of this type of system over classic coverage (65,66,67,68). There are authors who value its use only temporarily until definitive coverage and no longer than 1 week due to the risk of colonisation with resistant microorganisms (69).…”
Section: Risk Factors and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding negative pressure therapy, a number of studies have shown a decreased infection rate in open tibial fractures, the possibility of extending the time to definitive coverage, and a lower failure rate of definitive flaps (63,64). However, other studies have shown no clear evidence for the advantage of this type of system over classic coverage (65,66,67,68). There are authors who value its use only temporarily until definitive coverage and no longer than 1 week due to the risk of colonisation with resistant microorganisms (69).…”
Section: Risk Factors and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New articles have recently appeared questioning the effectiveness of NPWT. The study by Jensen et al [15] did not recommend using of NPWT directly for internal osteosynthesis. The study by Älgå et al [16] found no economic benefit of NPWT for open lower extremity fractures in terms of wound management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Haidari et al concluded that NPWT may be used for a few days until definitive flap cover can be performed, and recommended that comparative studies should be performed to determine the role and safety of NPWT in the treatment of FRI. In a second systematic review on this topic by Jensen et al, seven of the ten included studies were case reports with less than ten patients [ 69 ]. The authors pointed out that the quality of the existing literature was low.…”
Section: Role Of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (Npwt)mentioning
confidence: 99%