2007
DOI: 10.3103/s0891416807030019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to differentiate among strains of the glanders pathogen Burkholderia mallei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other typing methods have revealed greater diversity between B. mallei strains. Indeed, RAPD analysis, which is based on random amplification of genomic fragments by PCR and comparison of amplified bands on agarose gels ( 32 , 33 ), proved to have a higher discriminatory power than MLST-7 as it enabled the identification of B. mallei clusters. However, clustering, and thus also the conclusions drawn on the basis of this method, heavily depends on the primers used for the initial amplification ( 33 ).…”
Section: B Mallei Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other typing methods have revealed greater diversity between B. mallei strains. Indeed, RAPD analysis, which is based on random amplification of genomic fragments by PCR and comparison of amplified bands on agarose gels ( 32 , 33 ), proved to have a higher discriminatory power than MLST-7 as it enabled the identification of B. mallei clusters. However, clustering, and thus also the conclusions drawn on the basis of this method, heavily depends on the primers used for the initial amplification ( 33 ).…”
Section: B Mallei Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, RAPD analysis, which is based on random amplification of genomic fragments by PCR and comparison of amplified bands on agarose gels ( 32 , 33 ), proved to have a higher discriminatory power than MLST-7 as it enabled the identification of B. mallei clusters. However, clustering, and thus also the conclusions drawn on the basis of this method, heavily depends on the primers used for the initial amplification ( 33 ). Genotyping by different region (DFR) PCR targeting species-specific DNA sequences segregated 18 B. mallei strains into 11 types, which could be further clustered into two groups ( 34 ).…”
Section: B Mallei Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular methods viz. randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), MLST, BurkDiff, pulse‐field gel electrophoresis, multiple locus variable number of tandem repeats, MLVA and one gene pyrosequencing have also been developed for identification and differentiation of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei (Antonov et al., ; Bowers et al., ; Chantratita et al., ; Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, ; Scholz et al., ). Polymerase chain reaction and other molecular assays are laboratory based, time consuming, labour intensive and require complicated instrumentation and technical expertise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fliP-IS407A genomic region has earlier been used for the development of PCR and real-time PCR assays for direct and specific detection of B. mallei Tomaso et al, 2006). Polymerase chain reaction-based assays reported prior to the year 2006 provided indirect proof of B. mallei detection based on the absence of B. pseudomallei-specific DNA sequences in B. mallei (Lee, Wang, & Yap, 2005;Thibault, Valade, & Vidal, 2004 pseudomallei (Antonov et al, 2007;Bowers et al, 2010;Chantratita et al, 2006;Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, 2014;Scholz et al, 2014 (Mirzai, Safi, Mossavari, Afshar, & Bolourchian, 2016;Pal et al, 2018). One LAMP assay has limitation regarding specificity (Mirzai et al, 2016) and the other has a detection limit of 1 pg genomic DNA of B. mallei (Pal et al, 2018).…”
Section: B Malleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In year 2006, A PCR assay and a 5ʹ nuclease real‐time PCR test targeting flagellar biosynthesis protein‐insertion sequence ( fliP‐ IS 407 A) were reported for specific and direct identification of B. mallei (Scholz et al., ; Tomaso et al., ). Other molecular methods for identification and differentiation of B. mallei from B. pseudomallei include pulse‐field gel electrophoresis, 16S rRNA sequencing, MLVA, PCR‐restriction fragment length polymorphism, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), MLST, BurkDiff and one gene pyrosequencing (Antonov et al., , ; Bowers et al., ; Chantratita et al., ; Gilling, Luna, & Pflugradt, ; Harvey & Minter, ; Scholz et al., ; Tanpiboonsak, Paemanee, Bunyarataphan, & Tungpradabkul, ). The described molecular methods are expensive, time‐consuming and labour intensive and require technical expertise, making them non‐viable for many laboratories with resource‐poor settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%