2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of metabarcoding for meiofauna ecological patterns assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the result of this study, the reads of D. palustris, the species missing from the reference library during the initial analyses, were clustered into a discrete MOTU, which further confirms the ability of metabarcoding using V1 and V2 hypervariable region of 18S in 97% pairwise similarity to discriminate the sequences into species. In congruence with previous metabarcoding studies (Guardiola et al, 2015;De Faria et al, 2018;Günther et al, 2018), we further suggest the successful use of 18S gene especially in case of metabarcoding of meiofauna communities in which amplification of COI barcode region has shown to be less successful for some organisms such as nematodes (Haenel et al, 2017). Laophonte sp.…”
Section: Metabarcodingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Concerning the result of this study, the reads of D. palustris, the species missing from the reference library during the initial analyses, were clustered into a discrete MOTU, which further confirms the ability of metabarcoding using V1 and V2 hypervariable region of 18S in 97% pairwise similarity to discriminate the sequences into species. In congruence with previous metabarcoding studies (Guardiola et al, 2015;De Faria et al, 2018;Günther et al, 2018), we further suggest the successful use of 18S gene especially in case of metabarcoding of meiofauna communities in which amplification of COI barcode region has shown to be less successful for some organisms such as nematodes (Haenel et al, 2017). Laophonte sp.…”
Section: Metabarcodingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, it is known that the 18S rDNA marker we selected may underestimate diversity for some taxa 32 , potentially explaining the low number of ZOTUs for some groups such as Rotifera and Kinorhyncha. Regardless of potential problems and differences between different approaches, one of the main messages of our study is that we confirm the use of metabarcoding on meiofauna as a tool for biodiversity monitoring 19,21,22,25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…There is now strong evidence supporting that eDNA techniques can detect complex spatial variability in estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems (Chariton et al, 2015;Faria et al, 2018); and our data additionally supports its use to biodiversity assessment in a heavily impacted estuary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The Rio Doce eDNA composition was similar to other estuarine and marine sediments assessed by metabarcoding methods (Fonseca et al, 2010;Faria et al, 2018). Nematoda, Gastrotricha and Crustaceans were highly dominant in the estuary with local changes in relative abundance across PeerJ reviewing PDF | (2019:08:40630:1:1:NEW 1 Oct 2019)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation