2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9628-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Matching Methods in Higher Education Research: Answering Whether Attendance at a 2-Year Institution Results in Differences in Educational Attainment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order for a propensity score matching analysis to provide plausible estimates, it must adhere to three assumptions: conditional independence, common support, and covariate balance (Reynolds and DesJardins 2009).…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching: Model Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for a propensity score matching analysis to provide plausible estimates, it must adhere to three assumptions: conditional independence, common support, and covariate balance (Reynolds and DesJardins 2009).…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching: Model Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 This implies that the difference between treatment and control groups should be no more than 20 percent of a standard deviation. Table 3 presents the results of the logistic regression analysis of using library resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades social scientists have expressed increasing concern about the validity and reliability of research examining the effect of a particular program, activity, or experience -often termed "treatment" -in observational data where participation in the treatment is not randomly assigned (Dehejia & Wahba, 1999;LaLonde, 1986;Reynolds & DesJardins, 2009;Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983;Rubin, 2001Rubin, , 2008Schneider, Carnoy, Kilpatrick, Schmidt, & Shavelson, 2007). This concern arises primarily from the inability of traditional covariate adjustment methods to account for unobserved characteristics upon which those who select to participate in the treatment of interest might systematically differ from those who chose not to participate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new variable is then used to examine the effect of the treatment across cases that share a similar propensity for selecting into the treatment, thus minimizing the potential bias introduced by the observed "selection effect." Although some postsecondary education researchers have attempted to show the importance of this method for examining a range of important research questions using observational data (Brand & Halaby, 2006;Reynolds & DesJardins, 2009;Titus, 2007), other scholars have questioned the perceived uniform effectiveness of propensity score matching to produce more accurate estimates and have shown that this approach may not always improve the accuracy of the findings and is vulnerable to a range of research design and analysis decisions (Padgett, Salisbury, An, & Pascarella, in press;Peikes, Moreno, & Orzol, 2008;Shadish, Clark, & Steiner, 2008;Steiner, Cook, Shadish, and Clark, in press). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation