2011
DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2011.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of magnets with single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Prior experience with magnetic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in adult and pediatric population has shown the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this surgical technique. 7 In that experience, the adjunctive use of magnets enabled us either to reduce the number of ports needed or to perform transumbilical surgery. Our group first performed magnetic-assisted TUC with two magnets in both pediatric and adult patients, but it was cumbersome because of the potential for magnet collision, and we felt it was too complex to gain widespread adoption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Prior experience with magnetic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in adult and pediatric population has shown the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this surgical technique. 7 In that experience, the adjunctive use of magnets enabled us either to reduce the number of ports needed or to perform transumbilical surgery. Our group first performed magnetic-assisted TUC with two magnets in both pediatric and adult patients, but it was cumbersome because of the potential for magnet collision, and we felt it was too complex to gain widespread adoption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Recent reports from our group have examined the feasibility and safety of magnet-assisted transumbilical surgery in a range of operations, showing adequate triangulation and effective retraction of target organs. [5][6][7] Still, this novel technique during TUC requires the use of two magnets, which increases procedural complexity, chiefly because of the risk of magnet collision (especially in the pediatric population). In an effort to further simplify the procedure, we modified our approach with magnet-assisted TUC using a hybrid technique with only one magnet and a curve grasper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suction cups [19] or fan-shaped levers [3] can be adopted in this case. On the other hand, traumatic graspers (e.g., crocodile jaws) are a viable solution if the surgeon plans to remove the retracted tissue at the end of the procedure (e.g., cholecystectomy) [4].…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic surgical instruments developed to date include cameras [3], retractors [4], dissectors [3], and cautery devices [5], with trials performed on animal and human models via singleincision access [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kume et al demonstrated porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy [13] and colonic resection [14] with the aid of magnetic retraction. The Hospital de Clínicas in Buenos Aires has reported the clinical use of magnetized instruments (NdFeB) for single site laparoscopy [15], [16]. Clinical investigation of single-port laparoscopic colectomy was demonstrated to be safe and effective with the aid of magnetic retraction by Uematsa et al [17] while single site laparoscopy investigations by Cho et al have been limited to canine ileocecectomy (resection of the lower small intestine) [18].…”
Section: A Clinical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%