1989
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.26.1.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of low density lipoprotein receptor activity of lymphocytes to determine the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia in a rural South African community.

Abstract: SUMMARYThe diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in three rural South African communities in which hypercholesterolaemia is very prevalent could be confirmed by the measurement of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor activity in circulating lymphocytes. A nominal cut off point could be proposed which separated the LDL receptor activity of 24 clinically diagnosed heterozygous FH patients and 31 healthy people. LDL receptor activity was measured as total degradation of 1251-LDL and expressed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 680 LDLR mutations have been identified (Varret et al 1998 [LDLR Database]; Heath et al 2001 [The Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (LDLR) Gene in Familial Hypercholesterolemia]). In relatively isolated populations-including the French Canadians in northeastern Quebec (Moorjani et al 1989;Leitersdorf et al 1990), Afrikaners in South Africa (Steyn et al 1989;Kotze et al 1991), Ashkenazi Jew (AJ) individuals (Seftel et al 1989;Meiner et al 1991), Druze (Landsberger et al 1992), Christian Lebanese (Lehrman et al 1987), Finns (Aalto-Setala et al 1992Koivisto et al 1992), and Tunisians (Slimane et al 1993)-there is an increased prevalence of FH, which reaches its height in AJ individuals (in whom the frequency is 1 heterozygote per 67-69 individual [Seftel et al 1989]). In these populations, a small number of LDLR mutations predominate, which either were introduced at a founder time or appeared in more-recent generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 680 LDLR mutations have been identified (Varret et al 1998 [LDLR Database]; Heath et al 2001 [The Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (LDLR) Gene in Familial Hypercholesterolemia]). In relatively isolated populations-including the French Canadians in northeastern Quebec (Moorjani et al 1989;Leitersdorf et al 1990), Afrikaners in South Africa (Steyn et al 1989;Kotze et al 1991), Ashkenazi Jew (AJ) individuals (Seftel et al 1989;Meiner et al 1991), Druze (Landsberger et al 1992), Christian Lebanese (Lehrman et al 1987), Finns (Aalto-Setala et al 1992Koivisto et al 1992), and Tunisians (Slimane et al 1993)-there is an increased prevalence of FH, which reaches its height in AJ individuals (in whom the frequency is 1 heterozygote per 67-69 individual [Seftel et al 1989]). In these populations, a small number of LDLR mutations predominate, which either were introduced at a founder time or appeared in more-recent generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13] En yüksek AH prevelansının Güney Afrika'da (HeAH sıklığı 70'te 1) olduğu bildirilmiştir. [11] Fransız Kanadalılarda ise 270'te 1 kişinin HeAH olduğu tahmin edilmektedir. [12] Lübnan'da HoAH prevalansı 10.000'de 1 gibi daha yüksek orandadır.…”
unclassified
“…In most investigated populations, the heterozygote form occurs in at least 1:500 and the homozygous form in one in one million individuals [ 15 ], although in some populations, for example the Afrikaner population in South Africa, heterozygosity is found in less than 1:80 individuals [ 16 , 17 ]. This unusual high frequency is due to founder effects and no heterozygote advantage has been identified.…”
Section: Ldlr-associated Fhmentioning
confidence: 99%