2002
DOI: 10.1076/frag.6.1.104.8854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Lagrange Diagrams in Precise Initiation Blasting. Part I: Two Interacting Blastholes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rossmanith (2002) proposes that maximising stress-wave interaction within the body of a blast should maximise the amount of fracturing occurring, at both the micro-and macro-scale. Various field researchers (e.g.…”
Section: Fragmentation Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rossmanith (2002) proposes that maximising stress-wave interaction within the body of a blast should maximise the amount of fracturing occurring, at both the micro-and macro-scale. Various field researchers (e.g.…”
Section: Fragmentation Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ird, the stress wave decays as the distance increases. Tensile fracturing will only occur if the wave amplitude has exceeded a certain threshold [16]. Fourth, based on an example of linear elastic fracture mechanics, Exadaktylos [17] demonstrated that a crack close to more than one free surface has a higher stress intensity than a crack close to one free surface with the same internal pressure.…”
Section: E First Crack On the Bevel Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of stress wave interaction between blast holes with a single free surface. Compared to the 2D model with the assumption of an infinitely long charge length presented in the previous studies of Rossmanith [ 9 ] and Yi et al [ 23 ], the stress wave interaction in a 3D model of short-delay blasting with a single free surface is much more complicated. As seen in Fig 2 , the existence of a free surface would lead to additional superposition of the reflected stress wave from the first blast hole with the incoming stress wave from the second blast hole ( Fig 2C ), which affects the rock fragmentation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another controversial reason is that since short-delay blasting is possible with the increase of initiating accuracy for detonators, stress waves interaction between adjacent blast holes does occur and plays an important role in rock fragmentation [ 8 10 ]. Rossmanith [ 9 ] and Rossmanith and Kouzniak [ 10 ] constructed a 2D model to study the possible area of shock wave interaction and showed how a positive effect of shock wave interaction could be achieved in an charge column with infinitely length. Chiappetta [ 11 ] indicated that short-delay internals such as 2 ms, which was short enough for stress waves from adjacent blast holes to interact with each other, was beneficial to improve fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%