3rd Annual International Conferences on Computer Games, Multimedia and Allied Technology (CGAT 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.5176/978-981-08-5480-5_102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Interactive Simulations to Affect Driving Behaviour

Abstract: Many studies have shown that no matter what is done to try to get drivers to improve their driving behaviour there will always be some who would not see the benefit of modifying their behaviour. This paper reports on work in progress using a specially built simulator to convince drivers of the benefit of having good driving behaviour. The system uses Interactive Simulations in a Virtual Reality environment to immerse drivers in various road situations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using PEM and EfTP indicators to assess potential benefits, we will use a costing model to conduct our costbenefit analysis. For example, Rai and Wong (2010) suggest that a flight simulator costs only 15% of using actual helicopters for training purposes. Drawing from their study, we have selected the following cost categories as our evaluation metrics:…”
Section: Transfer Effectiveness = (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using PEM and EfTP indicators to assess potential benefits, we will use a costing model to conduct our costbenefit analysis. For example, Rai and Wong (2010) suggest that a flight simulator costs only 15% of using actual helicopters for training purposes. Drawing from their study, we have selected the following cost categories as our evaluation metrics:…”
Section: Transfer Effectiveness = (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an abundant literature on research dedicated to Interactive Virtual Reality (IVR) environments (Bell 1991;Rickel and Johnson 1998;Furlong, Vance et al 1999;Burdea and Coiffet 2003;Fox, Arena et al 2009;Jou and Wang 2012), IVR-based teaching and training programmes (Salzman, Dede et al 1999;Moreno and Mayer 2002;Moreno and Mayer 2007) or their application to different industries (Orlansky and String 1977;Bakken, Gould et al 1992;Filigenzi, Orr et al 2000;Deaton, Barba et al 2005;van Wyk and de Villiers 2009;Rai and Wong 2010;Schmitt, Agarwal et al 2012). Literature investigating and evaluating the impact of IVR-based training programs on safety and productivity records is far less abundant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational intelligence (CI) theories such as evolutionary algorithms [22,23], artificial neural networks [24], cognitive map analysis [25], Physarum solver [26][27][28], fuzzy sets [29][30][31], belief function [32][33][34], PSO [35][36][37], and so on [38], have been widely used to cope the complex problems including the permutation flow shop problem [39], supply chain network [40,41], traveling salesman problem [42], pattern recognition [43][44][45][46], power system [47], product design and manufacturing [48], and so on [49][50][51][52]. Recently, based on this progress in CI, many nature inspired approaches have been proposed to solve test selection optimization problem, such as the greedy strategy [53], the genetic algorithm [54,55], the evolutionary algorithm [56,57], and so on [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%